ClearMed
OncologyPhase I/II6 min read

Rilvegostomig Plus Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The I-SPY2.2 Randomized Clinical Trial

This Phase 2, multicenter, adaptively randomized neoadjuvant trial enrolled patients with high-risk stage II/III ERBB2-negative EBC (including those with ERBB2 low/ultralow tumors), as stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status and response-predictive subtypes.

Published in JAMA OncologyRandomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

12.4%

This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC.

What Changes?

Oncology · Phase I/II

Current Standard

Unlike immune-negative patients, many immune-positive patients who experienced pCR avoided standard , including anthracyclines, supporting further evaluation in (measurable biological signal)-selected populations.

New Finding

To evaluate the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody drug conjugate targeting low ERBB2 (formerly HER2) expression, combined with rilvegostomig (R), a bispecific antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 protein and T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain as initial therapy in I-SPY2.2 (RT-DXd).

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; (real-world effectiveness in the trial) data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (182 individuals) at the Phase I/II stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.

What This Means for You

This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC. Unlike immune-negative patients, many immune-positive patients who experienced pCR avoided standard , including anthracyclines, supporting further evaluation in (measurable biological signal)-selected populations.

The Discovery

The I-SPY2.2 trial tests personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes while reducing exposure to standard in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). To evaluate the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody drug conjugate targeting low ERBB2 (formerly HER2) expression, combined with rilvegostomig (R), a bispecific antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 protein and T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain as initial therapy in I-SPY2.2 (RT-DXd). This Phase 2, multicenter, adaptively randomized neoadjuvant trial enrolled patients with high-risk stage II/III ERBB2-negative EBC (including those with ERBB2 low/ultralow tumors), as stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status and response-predictive subtypes. It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication. Participants received up to 3 sequential treatment blocks, based on response and subtype: RT-DXd (block A), taxane-based therapy with/without (block B), and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) with/without (block C). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD). A total of 182 individuals (mean [SD] age: RT-DXd, 48.1 [13.1] years; control, 50.9 [12.0] years) participated in the trial. Eighty-eight were randomized to the contemporary control arm, and 108 of 289 remaining participants (37%) were randomized to RT-DXd; 3 participants did not receive block A treatment, and 11 did not receive the assigned control treatment, leaving the intention-to-treat population with 105 and 77 evaluable participants. Among 105 patients treated with RT-DXd in block A, the modeled pCR rate was 54% in immune-positive tumors, which met the predefined threshold for success. Similar pCR rates were observed in HR-positive, immune-positive disease (57%) and HR-negative, immune-positive disease (52%). Across all treatment blocks, overall pCR rates were similar to control regimens; however, among immune-positive patients who experienced pCR, 21 (62%) required only block A, and 33 (97%) avoided anthracycline-based . Enrollment was paused twice to evaluate grade 2 or higher ILD and resumed after data safety monitoring board approval. The most common AEs were fatigue and nausea. Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism and ILD (3 of 105 [2.9%] each). ILD occurred in 13, including 1 grade 3 event, and was identified early with serial chest computed tomography monitoring.

How It Works, Simply

This oncology research focuses on antibodies · T cells · Immune response. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (182 individuals) at the Phase I/II stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (182 individuals) at the Phase I/II stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
105 patients
Study Cohort
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (182 individuals) · Phase I/II

Biological Pathway & Modality

Antibodies · T cells · Immune response

Intervention: Rilvegostomig Plus Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

The I-SPY2.2 trial tests personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes while reducing exposure to standard in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC).

To evaluate the and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody drug conjugate targeting low ERBB2 (formerly HER2) expression, combined with rilvegostomig (R), a bispecific antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 protein and T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain as initial therapy in I-SPY2.2 (RT-DXd). This Phase 2, multicenter, adaptively randomized neoadjuvant trial enrolled patients with high-risk stage II/III ERBB2-negative EBC (including those with ERBB2 low/ultralow tumors), as stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status and response-predictive subtypes.

It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication. Participants received up to 3 sequential treatment blocks, based on response and subtype: RT-DXd (block A), taxane-based therapy with/without (block B), and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) with/without (block C).

The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD).

The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD).

A total of 182 individuals (mean [SD] age: RT-DXd, 48.1 [13.1] years; control, 50.9 [12.0] years) participated in the trial. Eighty-eight were randomized to the contemporary control arm, and 108 of 289 remaining participants (37%) were randomized to RT-DXd; 3 participants did not receive block A treatment, and 11 did not receive the assigned control treatment, leaving the intention-to-treat population with 105 and 77 evaluable participants.

Among 105 patients treated with RT-DXd in block A, the modeled pCR rate was 54% in immune-positive tumors, which met the predefined threshold for success. Similar pCR rates were observed in HR-positive, immune-positive disease (57%) and HR-negative, immune-positive disease (52%).

Across all treatment blocks, overall pCR rates were similar to control regimens; however, among immune-positive patients who experienced pCR, 21 (62%) required only block A, and 33 (97%) avoided anthracycline-based . Enrollment was paused twice to evaluate grade 2 or higher ILD and resumed after data safety monitoring board approval.

The most common AEs were fatigue and nausea. Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism and ILD (3 of 105 [2.9%] each).

ILD occurred in 13, including 1 grade 3 event, and was identified early with serial chest computed tomography monitoring.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC.

Unlike immune-negative patients, many immune-positive patients who experienced pCR avoided standard , including anthracyclines, supporting further evaluation in -selected populations.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC.”

Published in JAMA Oncology · Current Stage: Phase I/II

Practical Next Step

Questions for Your Next Doctor Visit

  1. 1This oncology study in JAMA Oncology is still at the Phase I/II stage—are there already approved options for me today?
  2. 2How do the potential benefits of this approach compare with the standard care I'm currently using?
  3. 3Given the study's key limitation (early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.), what risks or follow-up steps should we watch for?
Oncology · Phase I/II
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (182 individuals)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Early clinical cohort: Patients with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) (investigational)
Intervention & Mechanism
Rilvegostomig Plus Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The

Antibodies · T cells · Immune response

Key Limitation
Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Phase I/II

Classified as Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. 2Phase I/IIActive
  3. 3Human Evidence
  4. 4Meta & Practice

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Rilvegostomig Plus Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The I-SPY2.2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology. Published 2026;Oct 22. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42911610/

JAMA Oncology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42911610/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Oncology

View all Oncology briefings →
ONCOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): a prespecified interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX. Comparison of this promising new treatment strategy with contemporary total neoadjuvant therapy strategies is warranted.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Curative-intent management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evidence-based consensus guideline from the International Collaborating Oncology Organisations

This guideline provides a practical framework for standardisation of clinical management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and identification of key evidence gaps for future research. We recommend that curative-intent treatment should be offered to medically fit patients with no more than three metastatic lesions in two or fewer organs at baseline or following response to systemic therapy; multimodality treatment (comprising immunochemotherapy, locoregional radiotherapy, metastasis-directed therapy, and maintenance therapy) is recommended.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Development of the Children's Oncology Group long-term follow-up guideline for cancer genetics evaluation in childhood cancer survivors

Raising awareness of this guideline is crucial to enhancing the integration of genetics into survivorship care and improving health outcomes for childhood cancer survivors with CPS. This Policy Review details the importance, development, and anticipated impact of this new guideline.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology