3 Key Takeaways
Plain English Summary- 01Core Finding
It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial) data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication.
- 02Study Evidence
Tested in a randomized controlled trial (182 individuals) at the Phase I/II stage.
- 03Practical Meaning
Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.
What This Means for You
This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC. Unlike immune-negative patients, many immune-positive patients who experienced pCR avoided standard chemotherapy, including anthracyclines, supporting further evaluation in biomarker (measurable biological signal)-selected populations.
The Discovery
The I-SPY2.2 trial tests personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes while reducing exposure to standard chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). To evaluate the efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody drug conjugate targeting low ERBB2 (formerly HER2) expression, combined with rilvegostomig (R), a bispecific antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 protein and T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain as initial therapy in I-SPY2.2 (RT-DXd). This Phase 2, multicenter, adaptively randomized neoadjuvant trial enrolled patients with high-risk stage II/III ERBB2-negative EBC (including those with ERBB2 low/ultralow tumors), as stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status and response-predictive subtypes. It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; efficacy data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication. Participants received up to 3 sequential treatment blocks, based on response and subtype: RT-DXd (block A), taxane-based therapy with/without immunotherapy (block B), and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) with/without immunotherapy (block C). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD). The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD). A total of 182 individuals (mean [SD] age: RT-DXd, 48.1 [13.1] years; control, 50.9 [12.0] years) participated in the trial. Eighty-eight were randomized to the contemporary control arm, and 108 of 289 remaining participants (37%) were randomized to RT-DXd; 3 participants did not receive block A treatment, and 11 did not receive the assigned control treatment, leaving the intention-to-treat population with 105 and 77 evaluable participants. Among 105 patients treated with RT-DXd in block A, the modeled pCR rate was 54% in immune-positive tumors, which met the predefined threshold for success. Similar pCR rates were observed in HR-positive, immune-positive disease (57%) and HR-negative, immune-positive disease (52%). Across all treatment blocks, overall pCR rates were similar to control regimens; however, among immune-positive patients who experienced pCR, 21 (62%) required only block A, and 33 (97%) avoided anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Enrollment was paused twice to evaluate grade 2 or higher ILD and resumed after data safety monitoring board approval. The most common AEs were fatigue and nausea. Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism and ILD (3 of 105 [2.9%] each). ILD occurred in 13, including 1 grade 3 event, and was identified early with serial chest computed tomography monitoring.
How It Works, Simply
This oncology research focuses on antibodies · T cells · Immune response. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (182 individuals) at the Phase I/II stage of medical research.
3 Key Takeaways
Clinical Takeaways- 01Core Finding
It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; efficacy data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication.
- 02Study Evidence
Tested in a randomized controlled trial (182 individuals) at the Phase I/II stage.
- 03Practical Meaning
Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.
Key Numbers
Biological Mechanism & Study Design
Study Design & Cohort
Randomized controlled trial
Randomized controlled trial (182 individuals) · Phase I/II
Biological Pathway & Modality
Antibodies · T cells · Immune response
Intervention: Rilvegostomig Plus Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The
Experimental Findings & Endpoints
The I-SPY2.2 trial tests personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes while reducing exposure to standard chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC).
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody drug conjugate targeting low ERBB2 (formerly HER2) expression, combined with rilvegostomig (R), a bispecific antibody targeting programmed cell death 1 protein and T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain as initial therapy in I-SPY2.2 (RT-DXd). This Phase 2, multicenter, adaptively randomized neoadjuvant trial enrolled patients with high-risk stage II/III ERBB2-negative EBC (including those with ERBB2 low/ultralow tumors), as stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status and response-predictive subtypes.
It was conducted at 30 sites in the US; efficacy data were analyzed continuously during the trial to update probabilities and other analyses before publication. Participants received up to 3 sequential treatment blocks, based on response and subtype: RT-DXd (block A), taxane-based therapy with/without immunotherapy (block B), and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) with/without immunotherapy (block C).
The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD).
The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), with focused monitoring for interstitial lung disease (ILD).
A total of 182 individuals (mean [SD] age: RT-DXd, 48.1 [13.1] years; control, 50.9 [12.0] years) participated in the trial. Eighty-eight were randomized to the contemporary control arm, and 108 of 289 remaining participants (37%) were randomized to RT-DXd; 3 participants did not receive block A treatment, and 11 did not receive the assigned control treatment, leaving the intention-to-treat population with 105 and 77 evaluable participants.
Among 105 patients treated with RT-DXd in block A, the modeled pCR rate was 54% in immune-positive tumors, which met the predefined threshold for success. Similar pCR rates were observed in HR-positive, immune-positive disease (57%) and HR-negative, immune-positive disease (52%).
Across all treatment blocks, overall pCR rates were similar to control regimens; however, among immune-positive patients who experienced pCR, 21 (62%) required only block A, and 33 (97%) avoided anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Enrollment was paused twice to evaluate grade 2 or higher ILD and resumed after data safety monitoring board approval.
The most common AEs were fatigue and nausea. Serious AEs included pulmonary embolism and ILD (3 of 105 [2.9%] each).
ILD occurred in 13, including 1 grade 3 event, and was identified early with serial chest computed tomography monitoring.
Clinical Translation & Practice Context
This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC.
Unlike immune-negative patients, many immune-positive patients who experienced pCR avoided standard chemotherapy, including anthracyclines, supporting further evaluation in biomarker-selected populations.
The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl
“This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with RT-DXd demonstrated promising activity, with mostly low-grade toxic effects in immune-positive, ERBB2-negative EBC.”
Published in JAMA Oncology · Current Stage: Phase I/II