ClearMed
All Oncology BriefingsThe Lancet Oncology
OncologyClinical Practice6 min read

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): a prespecified interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial

Here, we present a prespecified interim analysis of event-free survival.

Published in The Lancet OncologyRandomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

8%

In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX.

What Changes?

Oncology · Clinical Practice

Current Standard

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by clinical T stage and N stage), using permuted blocks, to receive neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) followed by two cycles of intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg on day 1) plus CAPOX (oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1-14 and intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1; experimental group) or long-course chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m 2 twice daily) followed by two cycles of CAPOX (standard-of-care group).

New Finding

Comparison of this promising new treatment strategy with contemporary total neoadjuvant therapy strategies is warranted.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    This open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (n=113) at the clinical practice stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

What This Means for You

In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX. Comparison of this promising new treatment strategy with contemporary total neoadjuvant therapy strategies is warranted.

The Discovery

To our knowledge, UNION is the first Phase 3 trial to assess a neoadjuvant strategy incorporating radiotherapy, , and chemotherapy compared with standard care in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, which reported positive results for the primary endpoint (blinded independent review committee [BIRC]-assessed pathological complete response rate; 39·a clinically meaningful level vs 15·3%). Here, we present a prespecified interim analysis of event-free survival. This open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with untreated cT3-4 or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma (≤10 cm distance from the anal verge) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by clinical T stage and N stage), using permuted blocks, to receive neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) followed by two cycles of intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg on day 1) plus CAPOX (oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1-14 and intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1; experimental group) or long-course chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m 2 twice daily) followed by two cycles of CAPOX (standard-of-care group). After surgery, both groups received six cycles of adjuvant CAPOX, and the experimental group additionally received adjuvant camrelizumab for up to 15 cycles. The primary endpoint was BIRC-assessed pathological complete response rate in the intention-to-treat population, which has been previously reported. Here, we performed a prespecified interim analysis of investigator-assessed event-free survival (one of the key secondary endpoints, defined as time from randomisation to radiographic progression precluding surgery, local recurrence or distant metastasis, or death) in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients) with a boundary of a two-sided p values less than 0·0102. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment according to the assigned regimen. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04928807, and is active, but no longer recruiting. Between July 23, 2021, and March 1, 2023, 231 patients (153 [66%] males and 78 [34%] females; 227 [9a clinically meaningful level] were Han Chinese, and four [2%] were other ethnicity Chinese) were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=113) and standard-of-care group (n=118). As of Oct 1, 2025, the median follow-up duration was 36·7 months (IQR 32·6-39·9) in the experimental group and 34·7 months (31·1-39·1) in the standard-of-care group. The 3-year investigator-assessed event-free survival rate was 91·3% (95% CI 83·9-95·4) in the experimental group versus 77·4% (67·9-84·4) in the standard-of-care group (stratified 0·33 [0·15-0·71]; two-sided log-rank p=0·0029). During the entire treatment period, the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased lymphocyte count (23 [20%] of 115 in the experimental group vs 31 [2a clinically meaningful level] of 112 in the standard-of-care group), decreased white blood cell count (13 [11%] vs 16 [14%]), decreased neutrophil count (13 [11%] vs 13 [12%]), and decreased platelet count (seven [6%] vs 15 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 22 (19%) versus 15 (13%) patients, with the most common being decreased platelet count (one [1%] vs six [5%]), and radiation gastroenteritis (two [2%] vs four [4%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the experimental group (septic shock related to chemotherapy, but unrelated to camrelizumab) and none in the standard-of-care group.

How It Works, Simply

This oncology research focuses on immune response. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (n=113) at the clinical practice stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    This open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (n=113) at the clinical practice stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
3%
Clinical Outcome
20%
Clinical Outcome
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (n=113) · Clinical Practice

Biological Pathway & Modality

Immune response

Intervention: Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

To our knowledge, UNION is the first Phase 3 trial to assess a neoadjuvant strategy incorporating radiotherapy, , and chemotherapy compared with standard care in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, which reported positive results for the primary endpoint (blinded independent review committee [BIRC]-assessed pathological complete response rate; 39·a clinically meaningful level vs 15·3%).

Here, we present a prespecified interim analysis of event-free survival. This open-label, randomised, Phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China.

Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with untreated cT3-4 or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma (≤10 cm distance from the anal verge) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by clinical T stage and N stage), using permuted blocks, to receive neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) followed by two cycles of intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg on day 1) plus CAPOX (oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1-14 and intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 on day 1; experimental group) or long-course chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m 2 twice daily) followed by two cycles of CAPOX (standard-of-care group).

After surgery, both groups received six cycles of adjuvant CAPOX, and the experimental group additionally received adjuvant camrelizumab for up to 15 cycles. The primary endpoint was BIRC-assessed pathological complete response rate in the intention-to-treat population, which has been previously reported.

Here, we performed a prespecified interim analysis of investigator-assessed event-free survival (one of the key secondary endpoints, defined as time from randomisation to radiographic progression precluding surgery, local recurrence or distant metastasis, or death) in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients) with a boundary of a two-sided p values less than 0·0102. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment according to the assigned regimen.

The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04928807, and is active, but no longer recruiting. Between July 23, 2021, and March 1, 2023, 231 patients (153 [66%] males and 78 [34%] females; 227 [9a clinically meaningful level] were Han Chinese, and four [2%] were other ethnicity Chinese) were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=113) and standard-of-care group (n=118).

As of Oct 1, 2025, the median follow-up duration was 36·7 months (IQR 32·6-39·9) in the experimental group and 34·7 months (31·1-39·1) in the standard-of-care group. The 3-year investigator-assessed event-free survival rate was 91·3% (95% CI 83·9-95·4) in the experimental group versus 77·4% (67·9-84·4) in the standard-of-care group (stratified 0·33 [0·15-0·71]; two-sided log-rank p=0·0029).

During the entire treatment period, the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased lymphocyte count (23 [20%] of 115 in the experimental group vs 31 [2a clinically meaningful level] of 112 in the standard-of-care group), decreased white blood cell count (13 [11%] vs 16 [14%]), decreased neutrophil count (13 [11%] vs 13 [12%]), and decreased platelet count (seven [6%] vs 15 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 22 (19%) versus 15 (13%) patients, with the most common being decreased platelet count (one [1%] vs six [5%]), and radiation gastroenteritis (two [2%] vs four [4%]).

Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the experimental group (septic shock related to chemotherapy, but unrelated to camrelizumab) and none in the standard-of-care group.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX.

Comparison of this promising new treatment strategy with contemporary total neoadjuvant therapy strategies is warranted.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX.”

Published in The Lancet Oncology · Current Stage: Clinical Practice

Oncology · Clinical Practice
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (n=113)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Intervention & Mechanism
Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy

Immune response

Key Limitation
Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Clinical Practice

Classified as Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. Human Evidence
  4. 4Clinical PracticeActive

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): a prespecified interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. Published 2026;Nov 15. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42927765/

The Lancet Oncology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42927765/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Oncology

View all Oncology briefings →
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Curative-intent management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evidence-based consensus guideline from the International Collaborating Oncology Organisations

This guideline provides a practical framework for standardisation of clinical management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and identification of key evidence gaps for future research. We recommend that curative-intent treatment should be offered to medically fit patients with no more than three metastatic lesions in two or fewer organs at baseline or following response to systemic therapy; multimodality treatment (comprising immunochemotherapy, locoregional radiotherapy, metastasis-directed therapy, and maintenance therapy) is recommended.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Development of the Children's Oncology Group long-term follow-up guideline for cancer genetics evaluation in childhood cancer survivors

Raising awareness of this guideline is crucial to enhancing the integration of genetics into survivorship care and improving health outcomes for childhood cancer survivors with CPS. This Policy Review details the importance, development, and anticipated impact of this new guideline.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · PHASE I/II

Zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for second line treatment of large B-cell lymphoma in patients ineligible for transplantation (DALY 2-EU): primary analysis of an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study

The risk-benefit ratio observed in the DALY 2-EU study supports consideration of zamto-cel as a second-line standard treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for transplantation. However, there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials in patients ineligible for transplantation.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology