ClearMed
All Oncology BriefingsThe Lancet Oncology
OncologyPhase I/II6 min read

Zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for second line treatment of large B-cell lymphoma in patients ineligible for transplantation (DALY 2-EU): primary analysis of an open-label, multicentre, randomised Phase 2 study

To address this gap, we compared zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel), a CAR T-cell therapy directed at CD20 and CD19, with rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) chemoimmunotherapy in patients ineligible for transplantation with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Published in The Lancet OncologyRandomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

83%

The risk-benefit ratio observed in the DALY 2-EU study supports consideration of zamto-cel as a second-line standard treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for transplantation.

What Changes?

Oncology · Phase I/II

Current Standard

Prior options had limited human trial validation for zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem cd20-cd19-directed car t-cell therapy, for, leaving dosing and safety benchmarks open.

New Finding

However, there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials in patients ineligible for transplantation.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    DALY 2-EU is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, Phase 2 trial conducted at 45 centres across 12 countries in Europe.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (n=82) at the Phase I/II stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.

What This Means for You

The risk-benefit ratio observed in the DALY 2-EU study supports consideration of zamto-cel as a second-line standard treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for transplantation.

The Discovery

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is the standard second-line treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. However, there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials in patients ineligible for transplantation. To address this gap, we compared zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel), a CAR T-cell therapy directed at CD20 and CD19, with rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) chemoimmunotherapy in patients ineligible for transplantation with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. DALY 2-EU is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, Phase 2 trial conducted at 45 centres across 12 countries in Europe. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma confirmed histologically who were ineligible for transplantation and had received first-line chemoimmunotherapy containing a combination of an anthracycline-based regimen and an anti-CD20 , with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to zamto-cel (single intravenous infusion of 2·5 × 10 6 fresh (ie, non-cryopreserved) CAR T-cells per kg, capped at 100 kg, produced in a closed automated system) or R-GemOx (rituximab [375 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1], gemcitabine [1000 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1 or 2], and oxaliplatin [100 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1 or 2] administered for up to eight 14-day cycles). Randomisation was done with an interactive web response system and stratified by age, gender, lactate dehydrogenase, International Prognostic Index, histology, time to relapse after the start of first-line therapy, and country. The primary endpoint was event-free survival assessed by a masked independent review committee and compared all patients randomly assigned to the zamto-cel and R-GemOx groups using a one-sided log-rank test. Safety was assessed in all patients who received study treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04844866). Between Oct 14, 2021, and Jul 16, 2024, 219 patients were screened and 160 were randomly assigned to zamto-cel (n=82) and R-GemOx (n=78). The median age was 74·0 years (IQR 70·5-77·0). Patients were predominantly male (100 [63%] of 160 were men and 60 [38%] women) and White (91 [57%]), with race not reported for 64 (40%). Median vein-to-vein time for zamto-cel was 15 days (IQR 15-16). With a median follow-up of 17·0 months (IQR 9·0-22·8), event-free survival was longer in the zamto-cel group than in the R-GemOx group (6·21 months [95% CI 3·84-13·77] vs 2·53 months [1·97-3·35]; HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·27-0·58]; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 63 of 76 with zamto-cel and in 65 (86%) of 76 with R-GemOx. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (28 [37%] with zamto-cel and 17 [22%] with R-GemOx), anaemia (11 [14%] and 12 [16%]), and decreased neutrophil count (20 [26%] and seven [9%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 31 (41%) patients with zamto-cel and 50 (66%) with R-GemOx, most commonly malignant neoplasm progression (11 [14%] and 38 [50%]), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; six [8%] and none), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (four [5%] and none). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (3%) of 82 patients with zamto-cel (due to CRS and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) and in one (1%) of 78 with R-GemOx (malignant lymphoma progression).

How It Works, Simply

This oncology research focuses on antibodies · T cells · Immune response. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (n=82) at the Phase I/II stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    DALY 2-EU is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, Phase 2 trial conducted at 45 centres across 12 countries in Europe.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (n=82) at the Phase I/II stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
37%
Clinical Outcome
14%
Clinical Outcome
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (n=82) · Phase I/II

Biological Pathway & Modality

Antibodies · T cells · Immune response

Intervention: Zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is the standard second-line treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

However, there is no evidence from randomised controlled trials in patients ineligible for transplantation. To address this gap, we compared zamtocabtagene autoleucel (zamto-cel), a CAR T-cell therapy directed at CD20 and CD19, with rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) chemoimmunotherapy in patients ineligible for transplantation with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

DALY 2-EU is an open-label, multicentre, randomised, Phase 2 trial conducted at 45 centres across 12 countries in Europe. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma confirmed histologically who were ineligible for transplantation and had received first-line chemoimmunotherapy containing a combination of an anthracycline-based regimen and an anti-CD20 , with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less.

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to zamto-cel (single intravenous infusion of 2·5 × 10 6 fresh (ie, non-cryopreserved) CAR T-cells per kg, capped at 100 kg, produced in a closed automated system) or R-GemOx (rituximab [375 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1], gemcitabine [1000 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1 or 2], and oxaliplatin [100 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1 or 2] administered for up to eight 14-day cycles). Randomisation was done with an interactive web response system and stratified by age, gender, lactate dehydrogenase, International Prognostic Index, histology, time to relapse after the start of first-line therapy, and country.

The primary endpoint was event-free survival assessed by a masked independent review committee and compared all patients randomly assigned to the zamto-cel and R-GemOx groups using a one-sided log-rank test. Safety was assessed in all patients who received study treatment.

This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04844866). Between Oct 14, 2021, and Jul 16, 2024, 219 patients were screened and 160 were randomly assigned to zamto-cel (n=82) and R-GemOx (n=78).

The median age was 74·0 years (IQR 70·5-77·0). Patients were predominantly male (100 [63%] of 160 were men and 60 [38%] women) and White (91 [57%]), with race not reported for 64 (40%).

Median vein-to-vein time for zamto-cel was 15 days (IQR 15-16). With a median follow-up of 17·0 months (IQR 9·0-22·8), event-free survival was longer in the zamto-cel group than in the R-GemOx group (6·21 months [95% CI 3·84-13·77] vs 2·53 months [1·97-3·35]; HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·27-0·58]; p<0·0001).

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 63 of 76 with zamto-cel and in 65 (86%) of 76 with R-GemOx. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (28 [37%] with zamto-cel and 17 [22%] with R-GemOx), anaemia (11 [14%] and 12 [16%]), and decreased neutrophil count (20 [26%] and seven [9%]).

Serious adverse events occurred in 31 (41%) patients with zamto-cel and 50 (66%) with R-GemOx, most commonly malignant neoplasm progression (11 [14%] and 38 [50%]), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; six [8%] and none), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (four [5%] and none). Treatment-related deaths occurred in two (3%) of 82 patients with zamto-cel (due to CRS and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) and in one (1%) of 78 with R-GemOx (malignant lymphoma progression).

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

The risk-benefit ratio observed in the DALY 2-EU study supports consideration of zamto-cel as a second-line standard treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for transplantation.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“The risk-benefit ratio observed in the DALY 2-EU study supports consideration of zamto-cel as a second-line standard treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for transplantation.”

Published in The Lancet Oncology · Current Stage: Phase I/II

Oncology · Phase I/II
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (n=82)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Early clinical cohort: Patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (investigational)
Intervention & Mechanism
Zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for

Antibodies · T cells · Immune response

Key Limitation
Early-stage human studies — dosing, durability, and rare side effects still require Phase III confirmation.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Phase I/II

Classified as Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. 2Phase I/IIActive
  3. 3Human Evidence
  4. 4Meta & Practice

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Zamtocabtagene autoleucel, a tandem CD20-CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, for second line treatment of large B-cell lymphoma in patients ineligible for transplantation (DALY 2-EU): primary analysis of an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study. The Lancet Oncology. Published 2026;Nov 15. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42933440/

The Lancet Oncology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42933440/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Oncology

View all Oncology briefings →
ONCOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): a prespecified interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX. Comparison of this promising new treatment strategy with contemporary total neoadjuvant therapy strategies is warranted.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Curative-intent management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evidence-based consensus guideline from the International Collaborating Oncology Organisations

This guideline provides a practical framework for standardisation of clinical management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and identification of key evidence gaps for future research. We recommend that curative-intent treatment should be offered to medically fit patients with no more than three metastatic lesions in two or fewer organs at baseline or following response to systemic therapy; multimodality treatment (comprising immunochemotherapy, locoregional radiotherapy, metastasis-directed therapy, and maintenance therapy) is recommended.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Development of the Children's Oncology Group long-term follow-up guideline for cancer genetics evaluation in childhood cancer survivors

Raising awareness of this guideline is crucial to enhancing the integration of genetics into survivorship care and improving health outcomes for childhood cancer survivors with CPS. This Policy Review details the importance, development, and anticipated impact of this new guideline.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology