ClearMed
NephrologyMeta-Analysis5 min read

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use and Levels of Hemoglobin, Markers of Iron Metabolism, and Erythropoiesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Primary outcomes were changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit.

Published in JAMAMeta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

2.2%

In a of randomized clinical trials, compared with control, inhibitor use was associated with small statistically significant increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels.

What Changes?

Nephrology · Meta-Analysis

Current Standard

Conventional nephrology practice relies on standard-of-care monitoring and existing regimens prior to this + .

New Finding

The clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    Secondary outcomes were changes in red blood cell concentration, erythropoietin (EPO), and iron measures (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and hepcidin).

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + (543 participants) at the stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Pooled evidence synthesis depends on the quality, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias of included studies.

What This Means for You

In a of randomized clinical trials, compared with control, inhibitor use was associated with small statistically significant increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

The Discovery

To evaluate the associations between inhibitor use and levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and markers of iron metabolism and erythropoiesis compared with (inactive comparison treatment) or active comparator. Primary outcomes were changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit. Secondary outcomes were changes in red blood cell concentration, erythropoietin (EPO), and iron measures (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and hepcidin). A total of 85 randomized clinical trials were analyzed (median [IQR] duration, 24 [12-32] weeks), including 70 543 participants (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [9.4] years; 25 334 female [35.9%]). Mean (SD) baseline hemoglobin was 13.6 (1.5) g/dL; baseline hematocrit was 41.5% (4.9). Seventy-eight clinical trials (67 208 participants) compared inhibitors with , and 7 clinical trials (3335 participants) used active comparators, most commonly sitagliptin (2 trials [1158 participants]). From baseline to follow-up, hemoglobin changed by 0.55 g/dL (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.61 g/dL; P <.001) in the inhibitor group, and -0.08 g/dL (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.03 g/dL; P =.003) in the control group (difference, 0.60 g/dL; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.66 g/dL; P <.001). From baseline to follow-up, hematocrit changed substantially (95% CI, a clinically meaningful level to a clinically meaningful level; P <.001) in the inhibitor group and -0.13% (95% CI, -0.28% to 0.01%; P =.07) in the control group (difference, a clinically meaningful level; 95% CI, a clinically meaningful level to 2.52%; P <.001). Of the 6 secondary outcomes, 4 showed significant associations with inhibitors, including increased EPO (2.35 mIU/mL in inhibitor group vs 0.04 mIU/mL in control group; difference, 2.11 mIU/mL [95% CI, 0.5-3.71 mIU/mL]; P =.01) and decreased transferrin saturation (-a clinically meaningful level in inhibitor group vs -0.10% in control group; difference, -0.84% [95% CI, -1.21% to -0.47%]; P <.001).

How It Works, Simply

This nephrology research focuses on glomerular filtration & renal tubular preservation. Researchers evaluated it using a meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial (543 participants) at the meta-analysis stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    Secondary outcomes were changes in red blood cell concentration, erythropoietin (EPO), and iron measures (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and hepcidin).

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + (543 participants) at the stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Pooled evidence synthesis depends on the quality, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias of included studies.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
543 participants
Study Cohort
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial

Meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial (543 participants) · Meta-Analysis

Biological Pathway & Modality

Glomerular filtration & renal tubular preservation

Intervention: Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

To evaluate the associations between inhibitor use and levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and markers of iron metabolism and erythropoiesis compared with or active comparator.

Primary outcomes were changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit. Secondary outcomes were changes in red blood cell concentration, erythropoietin (EPO), and iron measures (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and hepcidin).

A total of 85 randomized clinical trials were analyzed (median [IQR] duration, 24 [12-32] weeks), including 70 543 participants (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [9.4] years; 25 334 female [35.9%]). Mean (SD) baseline hemoglobin was 13.6 (1.5) g/dL; baseline hematocrit was 41.5% (4.9).

Seventy-eight clinical trials (67 208 participants) compared inhibitors with , and 7 clinical trials (3335 participants) used active comparators, most commonly sitagliptin (2 trials [1158 participants]). From baseline to follow-up, hemoglobin changed by 0.55 g/dL (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.61 g/dL; P <.001) in the inhibitor group, and -0.08 g/dL (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.03 g/dL; P =.003) in the control group (difference, 0.60 g/dL; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.66 g/dL; P <.001).

From baseline to follow-up, hematocrit changed substantially (95% CI, a clinically meaningful level to a clinically meaningful level; P <.001) in the inhibitor group and -0.13% (95% CI, -0.28% to 0.01%; P =.07) in the control group (difference, a clinically meaningful level; 95% CI, a clinically meaningful level to 2.52%; P <.001). Of the 6 secondary outcomes, 4 showed significant associations with inhibitors, including increased EPO (2.35 mIU/mL in inhibitor group vs 0.04 mIU/mL in control group; difference, 2.11 mIU/mL [95% CI, 0.5-3.71 mIU/mL]; P =.01) and decreased transferrin saturation (-a clinically meaningful level in inhibitor group vs -0.10% in control group; difference, -0.84% [95% CI, -1.21% to -0.47%]; P <.001).

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

In a of randomized clinical trials, compared with control, inhibitor use was associated with small statistically significant increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels.

The clinical significance of these findings is unclear.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“In a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, compared with control, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with small statistically significant increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels.”

Published in JAMA · Current Stage: Meta-Analysis

Practical Next Step

Questions for Your Next Doctor Visit

  1. 1Based on my health history, do these nephrology findings (meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial (543 participants) in nephrology care) apply to my situation?
  2. 2How do the potential benefits of this approach compare with the standard care I'm currently using?
  3. 3Given the study's key limitation (pooled evidence synthesis depends on the quality, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias of included studies.), what risks or follow-up steps should we watch for?
Nephrology · Meta-Analysis
Study Type
Meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial

Meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial (543 participants)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial (543 participants) in nephrology care
Intervention & Mechanism
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor

Glomerular filtration & renal tubular preservation

Key Limitation
Pooled evidence synthesis depends on the quality, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias of included studies.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Meta-Analysis

Classified as Meta-analysis + Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. Human Evidence
  4. 4Meta-AnalysisActive

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use and Levels of Hemoglobin, Markers of Iron Metabolism, and Erythropoiesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. Published 2026;Oct 24. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42925557/

JAMA

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42925557/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Nephrology

View all Nephrology briefings →
NEPHROLOGY · PRECLINICAL

Gut-targeted interventions to complement PTH-lowering therapy

These findings highlight the potential of gut-targeted interventions to complement established parathyroid hormone-lowering strategies for improving skeletal health. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a major contributor to skeletal fragility in chronic kidney disease, yet fracture risk remains high despite parathyroid hormone-lowering therapy.

2/5 Preclinical
Evidence Meter · 2/5

Animal & Preclinical Data

Demonstrated in living animal models before large-scale human safety and dosing trials begin.

1 min readKidney International
NEPHROLOGY · PHASE I/II

Fingerprinting the polycystic kidney: radiomics of the noncystic parenchyma for earlier ADPKD detection

Small, cross-sectional, unmatched data require longitudinal validation of reproducibility, prognostic value, and clinical utility. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease risk stratification relies on total kidney volume, a validated marker of cyst burden and progression.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readKidney International
NEPHROLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Kidney stone disease: to drink or not to drink-that is the question

Effective prevention likely requires achieving a substantial increase in urine volume alongside comprehensive dietary and pharmacologic management. An important point to note is that these findings do not invalidate the protective role of increased urine volume but highlight the limitations of behavioral interventions alone.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readKidney International