ClearMed
All Nephrology BriefingsKidney International
NephrologyClinical Practice3 min read

Kidney stone disease: to drink or not to drink-that is the question

The recent Prevention of Urinary Stones With Hydration (PUSH) trial by Desai et al. (n = 1658 patients) evaluated a behavioral strategy to increase fluid intake and reduce recurrence over 2 years but found no significant benefit compared with standard of care, despite modest increases in urinary volume.

Published in Kidney InternationalEarly human trial
3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

Source

Follow-Up Window

2 years

Effective prevention likely requires achieving a substantial increase in urine volume alongside comprehensive dietary and pharmacologic management.

What Changes?

Nephrology · Clinical Practice

Current Standard

The limited (real-world effectiveness in the trial) of PUSH likely reflects insufficient adherence, with a minimal difference in urine output between active treatment and the control group, and improved baseline management in control subjects.

New Finding

An important point to note is that these findings do not invalidate the protective role of increased urine volume but highlight the limitations of behavioral interventions alone.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    These results contrast with earlier trials, notably that of Borghi et al. in 1996, in which sustained urine output above 2 L/d significantly reduced stone recurrence.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a early human trial (n = 1658) at the clinical practice stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

What This Means for You

An important point to note is that these findings do not invalidate the protective role of increased urine volume but highlight the limitations of behavioral interventions alone. Effective prevention likely requires achieving a substantial increase in urine volume alongside comprehensive dietary and pharmacologic management.

The Discovery

Kidney stone prevention presents a paradox: an effective, safe, and inexpensive intervention-hydration-is widely recommended, yet difficult to implement in practice. The recent Prevention of Urinary Stones With Hydration (PUSH) trial by Desai et al. (n = 1658 patients) evaluated a behavioral strategy to increase fluid intake and reduce recurrence over 2 years but found no significant benefit compared with standard of care, despite modest increases in urinary volume. These results contrast with earlier trials, notably that of Borghi et al. in 1996, in which sustained urine output above 2 L/d significantly reduced stone recurrence. The limited (real-world effectiveness in the trial) of PUSH likely reflects insufficient adherence, with a minimal difference in urine output between active treatment and the control group, and improved baseline management in control subjects.

How It Works, Simply

This nephrology research focuses on glomerular filtration & renal tubular preservation. Researchers evaluated it using an early human trial (n = 1658) at the clinical practice stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    These results contrast with earlier trials, notably that of Borghi et al. in 1996, in which sustained urine output above 2 L/d significantly reduced stone recurrence.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a early human trial (n = 1658) at the clinical practice stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
n = 1658
Study Cohort
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Early human trial

Early human trial (n = 1658) · Clinical Practice

Biological Pathway & Modality

Glomerular filtration & renal tubular preservation

Intervention: Kidney stone disease: to drink or not to drink-that is the question

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Kidney stone prevention presents a paradox: an effective, safe, and inexpensive intervention-hydration-is widely recommended, yet difficult to implement in practice.

The recent Prevention of Urinary Stones With Hydration (PUSH) trial by Desai et al. (n = 1658 patients) evaluated a behavioral strategy to increase fluid intake and reduce recurrence over 2 years but found no significant benefit compared with standard of care, despite modest increases in urinary volume. These results contrast with earlier trials, notably that of Borghi et al. in 1996, in which sustained urine output above 2 L/d significantly reduced stone recurrence.

The limited of PUSH likely reflects insufficient adherence, with a minimal difference in urine output between active treatment and the control group, and improved baseline management in control subjects.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

An important point to note is that these findings do not invalidate the protective role of increased urine volume but highlight the limitations of behavioral interventions alone.

Effective prevention likely requires achieving a substantial increase in urine volume alongside comprehensive dietary and pharmacologic management.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“Effective prevention likely requires achieving a substantial increase in urine volume alongside comprehensive dietary and pharmacologic management.”

Published in Kidney International · Current Stage: Clinical Practice

Nephrology · Clinical Practice
Study Type
Early human trial

Early human trial (n = 1658)

Evidence Score
3/5 · Real-World Observation
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

Who It Applies To
Early human trial (n = 1658) in nephrology care
Intervention & Mechanism
Kidney stone disease: to drink or not to drink-that is the question

Glomerular filtration & renal tubular preservation

Key Limitation
Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Clinical Practice

Classified as Early human trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. Human Evidence
  4. 4Clinical PracticeActive

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Kidney stone disease: to drink or not to drink-that is the question. Kidney International. Published 2026;Nov 15. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42901682/

Kidney International

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42901682/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Nephrology

View all Nephrology briefings →
NEPHROLOGY · PRECLINICAL

Gut-targeted interventions to complement PTH-lowering therapy

These findings highlight the potential of gut-targeted interventions to complement established parathyroid hormone-lowering strategies for improving skeletal health. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a major contributor to skeletal fragility in chronic kidney disease, yet fracture risk remains high despite parathyroid hormone-lowering therapy.

2/5 Preclinical
Evidence Meter · 2/5

Animal & Preclinical Data

Demonstrated in living animal models before large-scale human safety and dosing trials begin.

1 min readKidney International
NEPHROLOGY · PHASE I/II

Fingerprinting the polycystic kidney: radiomics of the noncystic parenchyma for earlier ADPKD detection

Small, cross-sectional, unmatched data require longitudinal validation of reproducibility, prognostic value, and clinical utility. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease risk stratification relies on total kidney volume, a validated marker of cyst burden and progression.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readKidney International
NEPHROLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

The macrophage paradox in renal AL amyloidosis: lessons from histology and imaging

These findings offer insights into the mechanisms of renal involvement and highlight the complex, context-dependent role of macrophages in amyloid clearance and tissue injury. In renal amyloid light chain amyloidosis, sustained and deep hematologic response drives organ response that continues to improve over time.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readKidney International