ClearMed
All Pulmonology BriefingsThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine
PulmonologyClinical Practice6 min read

Long-term safety and efficacy of twice-yearly depemokimab in type 2 asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype: 2-year integrated analysis of the phase 3a SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 studies and AGILE open-label extension

Here, we present long-term safety and efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial) outcomes over the 52-week, phase 3a open-label extension (OLE) of SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 (AGILE) alongside an integrated post-hoc analysis of the 104-week SWIFT and AGILE period.

Published in The Lancet Respiratory MedicineRandomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

71%

Twice-yearly depemokimab was well tolerated and demonstrated sustained (real-world effectiveness in the trial) over the 2-year SWIFT and AGILE period, supporting its long-term therapeutic benefit and safety profile.

What Changes?

Pulmonology · Clinical Practice

Current Standard

In SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2, patients (aged ≥12 years) with asthma with type 2 inflammation, an eosinophilic phenotype (≥150 cells/μL at screening or ≥300 cells/μL during the previous 12 months), and a history of at least two exacerbations in the previous 12 months despite receiving medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids were randomly assigned (2:1) to just-under-the-skin () depemokimab 100 mg or (inactive comparison treatment) every 26 weeks in addition to standard of care for 52 weeks.

New Finding

The double-blind, (inactive comparison treatment)-controlled, phase 3a SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 studies demonstrated depemokimab (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety over 52 weeks in patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation and an eosinophilic phenotype.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    Patients who completed SWIFT-1 or SWIFT-2 could join the single-arm, 52-week AGILE OLE study, conducted at 156 centres across 14 countries.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (629 patients) at the clinical practice stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

What This Means for You

Twice-yearly depemokimab was well tolerated and demonstrated sustained (real-world effectiveness in the trial) over the 2-year SWIFT and AGILE period, supporting its long-term therapeutic benefit and safety profile.

The Discovery

Depemokimab is the first ultra-long-acting biologic, with enhanced interleukin-5 binding affinity, high potency, and extended half-life, enabling twice-yearly dosing. The double-blind, (inactive comparison treatment)-controlled, phase 3a SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 studies demonstrated depemokimab (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety over 52 weeks in patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation and an eosinophilic phenotype. Here, we present long-term safety and outcomes over the 52-week, phase 3a open-label extension (OLE) of SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 (AGILE) alongside an integrated post-hoc analysis of the 104-week SWIFT and AGILE period. In SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2, patients (aged ≥12 years) with asthma with type 2 inflammation, an eosinophilic phenotype (≥150 cells/μL at screening or ≥300 cells/μL during the previous 12 months), and a history of at least two exacerbations in the previous 12 months despite receiving medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids were randomly assigned (2:1) to just-under-the-skin () depemokimab 100 mg or every 26 weeks in addition to standard of care for 52 weeks. Patients who completed SWIFT-1 or SWIFT-2 could join the single-arm, 52-week AGILE OLE study, conducted at 156 centres across 14 countries. Patients continued depemokimab (depemokimab-depemokimab group) or switched to depemokimab from (-depemokimab group). The primary endpoints for the 52-week AGILE OLE period were the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, and immunogenicity as measured by the presence of anti-drug antibodies and neutralising antibodies. Secondary outcomes, including exacerbation rate, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score, and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ), were also assessed. Additional post-hoc analyses were carried out to assess safety and over the 104-week integrated SWIFT and AGILE analysis period. AGILE OLE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05243680. The SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04719832 and NCT04718103. Between March 1, 2022, and May 19, 2025, 629 patients were included in the AGILE OLE study (419 patients in the depemokimab-depemokimab group and 210 patients in the -depemokimab group). During the 52-week AGILE OLE period, adverse events occurred in 297 of 419 patients in the depemokimab-depemokimab group and 146 (70%) of 210 patients in the -depemokimab group; serious adverse events were infrequent (37 [9%] of 419 in the depemokimab-depemokimab group and 19 [9%] of 210 in the -depemokimab group), with no treatment-related or fatal serious adverse events reported. In the depemokimab-depemokimab group, the reduced annualised exacerbation rate was sustained over 2 years (0·51 [95% CI 0·43-0·61] in the 52-week SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 period and 0·56 [0·47-0·66] in the AGILE OLE). Improvements in SGRQ total score, ACQ-5 score, and FEV 1 were maintained over 2 years. In the -depemokimab group, improvements in clinical outcomes were observed after the switch to depemokimab during the AGILE OLE.

How It Works, Simply

This pulmonology research focuses on inflammation · Antibodies · Immune response. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (629 patients) at the clinical practice stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    Patients who completed SWIFT-1 or SWIFT-2 could join the single-arm, 52-week AGILE OLE study, conducted at 156 centres across 14 countries.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (629 patients) at the clinical practice stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
9%
Clinical Outcome
52 weeks
Follow-Up Window
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (629 patients) · Clinical Practice

Biological Pathway & Modality

Inflammation · Antibodies · Immune response

Intervention: Long-term safety and of twice-yearly depemokimab in type 2 asthma with an

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Depemokimab is the first ultra-long-acting biologic, with enhanced interleukin-5 binding affinity, high potency, and extended half-life, enabling twice-yearly dosing.

The double-blind, -controlled, phase 3a SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 studies demonstrated depemokimab and safety over 52 weeks in patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation and an eosinophilic phenotype. Here, we present long-term safety and outcomes over the 52-week, phase 3a open-label extension (OLE) of SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 (AGILE) alongside an integrated post-hoc analysis of the 104-week SWIFT and AGILE period.

In SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2, patients (aged ≥12 years) with asthma with type 2 inflammation, an eosinophilic phenotype (≥150 cells/μL at screening or ≥300 cells/μL during the previous 12 months), and a history of at least two exacerbations in the previous 12 months despite receiving medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids were randomly assigned (2:1) to depemokimab 100 mg or every 26 weeks in addition to standard of care for 52 weeks. Patients who completed SWIFT-1 or SWIFT-2 could join the single-arm, 52-week AGILE OLE study, conducted at 156 centres across 14 countries.

Patients continued depemokimab (depemokimab-depemokimab group) or switched to depemokimab from (-depemokimab group). The primary endpoints for the 52-week AGILE OLE period were the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events, and immunogenicity as measured by the presence of anti-drug antibodies and neutralising antibodies.

Secondary outcomes, including exacerbation rate, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score, and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ), were also assessed. Additional post-hoc analyses were carried out to assess safety and over the 104-week integrated SWIFT and AGILE analysis period.

AGILE OLE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05243680. The SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04719832 and NCT04718103.

Between March 1, 2022, and May 19, 2025, 629 patients were included in the AGILE OLE study (419 patients in the depemokimab-depemokimab group and 210 patients in the -depemokimab group). During the 52-week AGILE OLE period, adverse events occurred in 297 of 419 patients in the depemokimab-depemokimab group and 146 (70%) of 210 patients in the -depemokimab group; serious adverse events were infrequent (37 [9%] of 419 in the depemokimab-depemokimab group and 19 [9%] of 210 in the -depemokimab group), with no treatment-related or fatal serious adverse events reported.

In the depemokimab-depemokimab group, the reduced annualised exacerbation rate was sustained over 2 years (0·51 [95% CI 0·43-0·61] in the 52-week SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 period and 0·56 [0·47-0·66] in the AGILE OLE). Improvements in SGRQ total score, ACQ-5 score, and FEV 1 were maintained over 2 years.

In the -depemokimab group, improvements in clinical outcomes were observed after the switch to depemokimab during the AGILE OLE.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

Twice-yearly depemokimab was well tolerated and demonstrated sustained over the 2-year SWIFT and AGILE period, supporting its long-term therapeutic benefit and safety profile.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“Twice-yearly depemokimab was well tolerated and demonstrated sustained efficacy over the 2-year SWIFT and AGILE period, supporting its long-term therapeutic benefit and safety profile.”

Published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · Current Stage: Clinical Practice

Pulmonology · Clinical Practice
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (629 patients)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation and an eosinophilic phenot
Intervention & Mechanism
Long-term safety and efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial) of twice-yearly depemokimab in type 2 asthma with an

Inflammation · Antibodies · Immune response

Key Limitation
Benefits and risks vary by individual health history — discuss with a healthcare professional.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Clinical Practice

Classified as Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. Human Evidence
  4. 4Clinical PracticeActive

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Long-term safety and efficacy of twice-yearly depemokimab in type 2 asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype: 2-year integrated analysis of the phase 3a SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 studies and AGILE open-label extension. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. Published 2026;Oct 29. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42956801/

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42956801/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Pulmonology

View all Pulmonology briefings →
PULMONOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Mediastinal Mass With Recurrent Hemorrhagic Pleural Effusion

Empirical antituberculosis therapy also was given, but no definitive diagnosis was established. A 55-year-old man was admitted with a 2-year history of recurrent dyspnea and exertional breathlessness, accompanied by intermittent blood-tinged sputum.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readChest
PULMONOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Bilateral Pulmonary Nodules After Lung Transplantation: A Rare Diagnosis

He was also placed on mycophenolic acid, which was soon held because of neutropenia. Antibody-mediated rejection was successfully treated with our institutional multimodal regimen, including a combination of plasmapheresis, carfilzomib, and anti-thymocyte globulin followed by monthly IV immunoglobulin and tocilizumab injections.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readChest
PULMONOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

A Young Man With Hypereosinophilia and Pseudochylothorax

There was no other significant environmental history. The patient received anti-tubercular therapy along with tapering corticosteroids, showing initial clinical improvement.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readChest