ClearMed
OncologyPhase III5 min read

HB0025 With Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Participants included those with nonsquamous NSCLC and squamous NSCLC.

Published in JAMA OncologyRandomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

65.9%

In this Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, HB0025 plus showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced, driver variant-negative NSCLC in both nonsquamous and squamous histologic types, supporting further evaluation in randomized Phase 3 clinical trials.

What Changes?

Oncology · Phase III

Current Standard

Conventional oncology practice relies on standard-of-care monitoring and existing regimens prior to this + study.

New Finding

This open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC without sensitizing , ALK, or ROS1 alterations across 13 hospitals in China.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    Patients were enrolled from January 15, 2024, to May 21, 2025.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + study (85 patients) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

What This Means for You

In this Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, HB0025 plus showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced, driver variant-negative NSCLC in both nonsquamous and squamous histologic types, supporting further evaluation in randomized Phase 3 clinical trials.

The Discovery

To evaluate the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety of HB0025 plus in previously untreated advanced, driver variant-negative NSCLC.

This open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC without sensitizing , ALK, or ROS1 alterations across 13 hospitals in China. Participants included those with nonsquamous NSCLC and squamous NSCLC. Patients were enrolled from January 15, 2024, to May 21, 2025. Data cutoff was April 20, 2026.

The primary end points were safety and investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. The secondary end points included disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Treatment (real-world effectiveness in the trial) was evaluable in 169 enrolled patients. The nonsquamous included 85 patients (median [IQR] age, 63.0 [58.0-68.0] years; 26 [30.6%] female and 59 [69.4%] male patients), and the squamous included 84 patients (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [60.0-69.0] years; 6 [7.1%] female and 78 [92.9%] male patients). In the nonsquamous , confirmed ORR was 36.4% (95% CI, 17.2%-59.3%) and 57.1% (95% CI, 44.1%-69.5%) in the 10-mg/kg and 20-mg/kg dose groups, respectively. In the squamous , ORR reached 68.2% (95% CI, 45.1%-86.1%) and 74.2% (95%, 61.5%-84.5%) at the respective doses. Median PFS was 12.52 months (95% CI, 10.15-16.56) in the nonsquamous and 14.78 months (95% CI, 11.30 to not estimable) in the squamous . The 12-month PFS rates were 54.3% (95% CI, 41.6%-65.3%) and 62.1% (95% CI, 49.9%-72.1%) in the nonsquamous and squamous cohorts, and the 12-month OS rates were 75.8% (95% CI, 65.0%-83.7%) and 85.5% (95% CI, 75.8%-91.5%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 56 of 85 patients in the nonsquamous and 51 of 84 (60.7%) in the squamous , mainly as hematologic toxic effects. Any-grade immune-related adverse events related to HB0025 occurred in 20 patients (23.5%) in the nonsquamous and 21 patients (25%) in the squamous .

How It Works, Simply

This oncology research focuses on immune response. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study (85 patients) at the Phase III stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    Patients were enrolled from January 15, 2024, to May 21, 2025.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + study (85 patients) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
85 patients
Study Cohort
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study

Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study (85 patients) · Phase III

Biological Pathway & Modality

Immune response

Intervention: HB0025 With for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

To evaluate the and safety of HB0025 plus in previously untreated advanced, driver variant-negative NSCLC.

This open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC without sensitizing , ALK, or ROS1 alterations across 13 hospitals in China. Participants included those with nonsquamous NSCLC and squamous NSCLC.

Patients were enrolled from January 15, 2024, to May 21, 2025. Data cutoff was April 20, 2026.

The primary end points were safety and investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. The secondary end points included disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Treatment was evaluable in 169 enrolled patients. The nonsquamous included 85 patients (median [IQR] age, 63.0 [58.0-68.0] years; 26 [30.6%] female and 59 [69.4%] male patients), and the squamous included 84 patients (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [60.0-69.0] years; 6 [7.1%] female and 78 [92.9%] male patients).

In the nonsquamous , confirmed ORR was 36.4% (95% CI, 17.2%-59.3%) and 57.1% (95% CI, 44.1%-69.5%) in the 10-mg/kg and 20-mg/kg dose groups, respectively. In the squamous , ORR reached 68.2% (95% CI, 45.1%-86.1%) and 74.2% (95%, 61.5%-84.5%) at the respective doses.

Median PFS was 12.52 months (95% CI, 10.15-16.56) in the nonsquamous and 14.78 months (95% CI, 11.30 to not estimable) in the squamous . The 12-month PFS rates were 54.3% (95% CI, 41.6%-65.3%) and 62.1% (95% CI, 49.9%-72.1%) in the nonsquamous and squamous cohorts, and the 12-month OS rates were 75.8% (95% CI, 65.0%-83.7%) and 85.5% (95% CI, 75.8%-91.5%), respectively.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 56 of 85 patients in the nonsquamous and 51 of 84 (60.7%) in the squamous , mainly as hematologic toxic effects. Any-grade immune-related adverse events related to HB0025 occurred in 20 patients (23.5%) in the nonsquamous and 21 patients (25%) in the squamous .

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

In this Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, HB0025 plus showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced, driver variant-negative NSCLC in both nonsquamous and squamous histologic types, supporting further evaluation in randomized Phase 3 clinical trials.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“In this Phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, HB0025 plus chemotherapy showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with advanced, driver variant-negative NSCLC in both nonsquamous and squamous histologic types, supporting further evaluation in randomized Phase 3 clinical trials.”

Published in JAMA Oncology · Current Stage: Phase III

Practical Next Step

Questions for Your Next Doctor Visit

  1. 1Based on my health history, do these oncology findings (patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR) apply to my situation?
  2. 2How do the potential benefits of this approach compare with the standard care I'm currently using?
  3. 3Given the study's key limitation (large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.), what risks or follow-up steps should we watch for?
Oncology · Phase III
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study

Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study (85 patients)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Patients with stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR
Intervention & Mechanism
HB0025 With Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2

Immune response

Key Limitation
Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Phase III

Classified as Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. 3Phase IIIActive
  4. 4Meta & Practice

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

HB0025 With Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology. Published 2026;Nov 5. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42986615/

JAMA Oncology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42986615/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Oncology

View all Oncology briefings →
ONCOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and chemotherapy versus standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (UNION): a prespecified interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

In this interim analysis, short-course radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab and CAPOX significantly improved 3-year event-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, with a safety profile similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by CAPOX. Comparison of this promising new treatment strategy with contemporary total neoadjuvant therapy strategies is warranted.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Curative-intent management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evidence-based consensus guideline from the International Collaborating Oncology Organisations

This guideline provides a practical framework for standardisation of clinical management of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma and identification of key evidence gaps for future research. We recommend that curative-intent treatment should be offered to medically fit patients with no more than three metastatic lesions in two or fewer organs at baseline or following response to systemic therapy; multimodality treatment (comprising immunochemotherapy, locoregional radiotherapy, metastasis-directed therapy, and maintenance therapy) is recommended.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology
ONCOLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Development of the Children's Oncology Group long-term follow-up guideline for cancer genetics evaluation in childhood cancer survivors

Raising awareness of this guideline is crucial to enhancing the integration of genetics into survivorship care and improving health outcomes for childhood cancer survivors with CPS. This Policy Review details the importance, development, and anticipated impact of this new guideline.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Lancet Oncology