ClearMed
All Gastroenterology BriefingsThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
GastroenterologyMeta-Analysis4 min read

Updated treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE-III): an initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD

Patient-centred targets (ie, disability, fatigue, and quality of life) directly reflect patients' well-being and are impaired in a substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; impairment should prompt assessment of inflammation and alternative causes and management through shared decision-making.

Published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & HepatologySystematic review + Observational cohort study
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

5/5

This framework supports consistent, evidence-based treat-to-target care.

What Changes?

Gastroenterology · Meta-Analysis

Current Standard

STRIDE-III also defines treatment-specific times to target achievement, new faecal calprotectin thresholds, and adaptations for resource-limited settings.

New Finding

Adjunctive targets (ie, urgency, histological remission in ulcerative colitis, transmural remission in Crohn's disease, and growth) are supported by studies showing association with favourable outcomes and guide treatment optimisation and tighter monitoring but do not necessarily require a change in therapeutic class.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    We aimed to update the STRIDE recommendations for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a systematic review + observational cohort study at the stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Targets are further classified as immediate, short-term, intermediate, and long-term.

What This Means for You

Adjunctive targets (ie, urgency, histological remission in ulcerative colitis, transmural remission in Crohn's disease, and growth) are supported by studies showing association with favourable outcomes and guide treatment optimisation and tighter monitoring but do not necessarily require a change in therapeutic class. Patient-centred targets (ie, disability, fatigue, and quality of life) directly reflect patients' well-being and are impaired in a substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; impairment should prompt assessment of inflammation and alternative causes and management through shared decision-making. Targets are further classified as immediate, short-term, intermediate, and long-term. STRIDE-III also defines treatment-specific times to target achievement, new faecal calprotectin thresholds, and adaptations for resource-limited settings. STRIDE-III distinguishes targets that should prompt treatment change from those that primarily guide optimisation and monitoring, while establishing a separate patient-centred pathway based on shared decision-making. This framework supports consistent, evidence-based treat-to-target care.

The Discovery

Since Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-II (STRIDE-II), new evidence has become available across inflammatory and patient-centred outcomes. We aimed to update the STRIDE recommendations for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published after the STRIDE-II search period. Findings were integrated with surveys of International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) members and paediatric gastroenterologists from the Porto group of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Statements were subsequently voted on using a modified Delphi approach; consensus was defined as ≥75% of participants rating a statement 7-10 on a 10-point scale. Of 13 071 records identified in the systematic review, 1018 were included. Surveys were completed by 60 of 79 IOIBD gastroenterologists and 23 of 30 paediatric gastroenterologists in the Porto group. STRIDE-III defines three conceptually distinct categories of treatment targets. Actionable targets include clinical response and remission, which reflect patient priorities, and objective inflammatory targets (C-reactive protein normalisation, faecal calprotectin within target range, and endoscopic remission), supported by interventional evidence demonstrating benefits of target-guided treatment modification.

How It Works, Simply

This gastroenterology research focuses on inflammation · Signalling pathway. Researchers evaluated it using a systematic review + Observational cohort study at the meta-analysis stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    We aimed to update the STRIDE recommendations for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a systematic review + observational cohort study at the stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Targets are further classified as immediate, short-term, intermediate, and long-term.

01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Systematic review + Observational cohort study

Systematic review + Observational cohort study · Meta-Analysis

Biological Pathway & Modality

Inflammation · Signalling pathway

Intervention: Updated treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE-III): an initiative

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Since Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-II (STRIDE-II), new evidence has become available across inflammatory and patient-centred outcomes.

We aimed to update the STRIDE recommendations for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published after the STRIDE-II search period.

Findings were integrated with surveys of International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) members and paediatric gastroenterologists from the Porto group of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Statements were subsequently voted on using a modified Delphi approach; consensus was defined as ≥75% of participants rating a statement 7-10 on a 10-point scale.

Of 13 071 records identified in the systematic review, 1018 were included. Surveys were completed by 60 of 79 IOIBD gastroenterologists and 23 of 30 paediatric gastroenterologists in the Porto group.

STRIDE-III defines three conceptually distinct categories of treatment targets. Actionable targets include clinical response and remission, which reflect patient priorities, and objective inflammatory targets (C-reactive protein normalisation, faecal calprotectin within target range, and endoscopic remission), supported by interventional evidence demonstrating benefits of target-guided treatment modification.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

Adjunctive targets (ie, urgency, histological remission in ulcerative colitis, transmural remission in Crohn's disease, and growth) are supported by studies showing association with favourable outcomes and guide treatment optimisation and tighter monitoring but do not necessarily require a change in therapeutic class.

Patient-centred targets (ie, disability, fatigue, and quality of life) directly reflect patients' well-being and are impaired in a substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; impairment should prompt assessment of inflammation and alternative causes and management through shared decision-making. Targets are further classified as immediate, short-term, intermediate, and long-term.

STRIDE-III also defines treatment-specific times to target achievement, new faecal calprotectin thresholds, and adaptations for resource-limited settings. STRIDE-III distinguishes targets that should prompt treatment change from those that primarily guide optimisation and monitoring, while establishing a separate patient-centred pathway based on shared decision-making.

This framework supports consistent, evidence-based treat-to-target care.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“This framework supports consistent, evidence-based treat-to-target care.”

Published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · Current Stage: Meta-Analysis

Gastroenterology · Meta-Analysis
Study Type
Systematic review + Observational cohort study

Systematic review + Observational cohort study

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Intervention & Mechanism
Updated treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE-III): an initiative

Inflammation · Signalling pathway

Key Limitation
Pooled evidence synthesis depends on the quality, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias of included studies.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Meta-Analysis

Classified as Systematic review + Observational cohort study along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. Human Evidence
  4. 4Meta-AnalysisActive

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Updated treatment targets in inflammatory bowel disease (STRIDE-III): an initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. Published 2026;Oct 19. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42896564/

The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42896564/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Gastroenterology

View all Gastroenterology briefings →
GASTROENTEROLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Prevalence of liver fibrosis and steatotic liver disease in community-dwelling adults in China (the CHESS-LiverHealth project): cross-sectional baseline data from a prospective cohort study

Silent Liver Damage: A Hidden Epidemic in China's Adult Population. Liver scarring and fatty liver disease are widespread among Chinese adults, largely fueled by metabolic issues and alcohol.

4/5 Strong Trial
Evidence Meter · 4/5

Strong Clinical Evidence

Tested directly in patients through a prospective clinical trial or large multicenter human cohort.

1 min readThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Gastroenterology editorial photograph for Aspirin after curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (ASAC): a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
GASTROENTEROLOGY · PHASE III

Aspirin after curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (ASAC): a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Aspirin After Colon Cancer: A Surprising Setback for a Common Drug. Taking aspirin after surgery for colon cancer that spread to the liver did not prevent the cancer from returning and was linked to worse survival and more serious side effects.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
GASTROENTEROLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Genetic variants and the risk of renal impairment in decompensated cirrhosis: a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study

Unlocking the Genetic Link Between Liver Failure and Kidney Damage. Scientists have pinpointed a specific gene, SUSD1, that significantly increases the risk of kidney problems in people with severe liver disease.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology