ClearMed
CardiologyPhase III5 min read

Myocardial Responses to Eplontersen in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: The CARDIO-TTRansform CMR study

This CMR study was a pre-specified, international, prospective study embedded within the randomized, placebo (inactive comparison treatment)-controlled Phase 3 CARDIO-TTRansform trial.

Published in CirculationRandomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

12.5%

Sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen resulted in substantially lower myocardial ECV and favorable changes in cardiac structure, biventricular systolic function, and myocardial deformation compared with (inactive comparison treatment) in a of patients mostly not on background stabilizer at baseline. These findings provide randomized evidence that lowering circulating transthyretin modifies myocardial disease progression in ATTR-CM and support serial multiparametric CMR for characterizing myocardial treatment response.

What Changes?

Cardiology · Phase III

Current Standard

Conventional cardiology practice relies on standard-of-care monitoring and existing regimens prior to this + study.

New Finding

We evaluated the myocardial effects of sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen using serial multiparametric magnetic resonance (CMR).

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    Participants underwent CMR at baseline and planned assessments at weeks 25, 49, 97, and 140.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + study (n=58) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

What This Means for You

Sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen resulted in substantially lower myocardial ECV and favorable changes in cardiac structure, biventricular systolic function, and myocardial deformation compared with (inactive comparison treatment) in a of patients mostly not on background stabilizer at baseline. These findings provide randomized evidence that lowering circulating transthyretin modifies myocardial disease progression in ATTR-CM and support serial multiparametric CMR for characterizing myocardial treatment response.

The Discovery

Transthyretin-lowering therapies target the underlying cause of transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), but their effects on myocardial burden and cardiac remodelling remain incompletely characterized. We evaluated the myocardial effects of sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen using serial multiparametric magnetic resonance (CMR).

This CMR study was a pre-specified, international, study embedded within the randomized, (inactive comparison treatment)-controlled Phase 3 CARDIO-TTRansform trial. Participants underwent CMR at baseline and planned assessments at weeks 25, 49, 97, and 140. The primary imaging analysis evaluated changes in CMR parameters using mixed models for repeated measures. Myocardial regression and progression were defined as ≥5 percentage-point decreases and increases in extracellular volume (ECV), respectively. All other patients were considered stable.

We enrolled 120 participants with baseline and ≥1 follow-up CMR assessment (eplontersen, n=58; , n=62; mean age, 76.7±6.5 years; 95% male; baseline stabilizer, a clinically meaningful level). At week 140 eplontersen resulted in lower ECV, compared with (least-squares mean difference [95% CI], -6.7 percentage points [ -8.7 to -4.7]; P<0.001) and lower native T1 ( -25.9ms [-41.7 to -10.2 ]; P=0.002) and left ventricular mass (-19.1g [-28.0 to -10.2]; P<0.001). Eplontersen also increased left ventricular ejection fraction (+5.1% [1.8-8.3]; P=0.002), right ventricular ejection fraction (+4.6% [0.6-8.7]; P=0.03), and left ventricular global , circumferential, and radial strain and right ventricular strain (all P<0.05), compared to (inactive comparison treatment). At week-140, myocardial regression occurred in a clinically meaningful level receiving eplontersen versus 0% receiving , whereas progression occurred in a clinically meaningful level versus 76%, respectively.

How It Works, Simply

This cardiology research focuses on . Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study (n=58) at the Phase III stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    Participants underwent CMR at baseline and planned assessments at weeks 25, 49, 97, and 140.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + study (n=58) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
5.1%
Clinical Outcome
0%
Clinical Outcome
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study

Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study (n=58) · Phase III

Biological Pathway & Modality

Intervention: Myocardial Responses to Eplontersen in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy: The

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Transthyretin-lowering therapies target the underlying cause of transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), but their effects on myocardial burden and cardiac remodelling remain incompletely characterized.

We evaluated the myocardial effects of sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen using serial multiparametric magnetic resonance (CMR).

This CMR study was a pre-specified, international, study embedded within the randomized, Phase 3 CARDIO-TTRansform trial. Participants underwent CMR at baseline and planned assessments at weeks 25, 49, 97, and 140.

The primary imaging analysis evaluated changes in CMR parameters using mixed models for repeated measures. Myocardial regression and progression were defined as ≥5 percentage-point decreases and increases in extracellular volume (ECV), respectively.

All other patients were considered stable.

We enrolled 120 participants with baseline and ≥1 follow-up CMR assessment (eplontersen, n=58; , n=62; mean age, 76.7±6.5 years; 95% male; baseline stabilizer, a clinically meaningful level). At week 140 eplontersen resulted in lower ECV, compared with (least-squares mean difference [95% CI], -6.7 percentage points [ -8.7 to -4.7]; P<0.001) and lower native T1 ( -25.9ms [-41.7 to -10.2 ]; P=0.002) and left ventricular mass (-19.1g [-28.0 to -10.2]; P<0.001).

Eplontersen also increased left ventricular ejection fraction (+5.1% [1.8-8.3]; P=0.002), right ventricular ejection fraction (+4.6% [0.6-8.7]; P=0.03), and left ventricular global , circumferential, and radial strain and right ventricular strain (all P<0.05), compared to . At week-140, myocardial regression occurred in a clinically meaningful level receiving eplontersen versus 0% receiving , whereas progression occurred in a clinically meaningful level versus 76%, respectively.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

Sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen resulted in substantially lower myocardial ECV and favorable changes in cardiac structure, biventricular systolic function, and myocardial deformation compared with in a of patients mostly not on background stabilizer at baseline.

These findings provide randomized evidence that lowering circulating transthyretin modifies myocardial disease progression in ATTR-CM and support serial multiparametric CMR for characterizing myocardial treatment response.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“Sustained transthyretin suppression with eplontersen resulted in substantially lower myocardial ECV and favorable changes in cardiac structure, biventricular systolic function, and myocardial deformation compared with placebo in a cohort of patients mostly not on background stabilizer at baseline. These findings provide randomized evidence that lowering circulating transthyretin modifies myocardial disease progression in ATTR-CM and support serial multiparametric CMR for characterizing myocardial treatment response.”

Published in Circulation · Current Stage: Phase III

Practical Next Step

Questions for Your Next Doctor Visit

  1. 1Based on my health history, do these cardiology findings (participants with baseline and ≥1 follow-up CMR assessment (eplontersen) apply to my situation?
  2. 2How do the potential benefits of this approach compare with the standard care I'm currently using?
  3. 3Given the study's key limitation (large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.), what risks or follow-up steps should we watch for?
Cardiology · Phase III
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study

Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study (n=58)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Participants with baseline and ≥1 follow-up CMR assessment (eplontersen
Intervention & Mechanism
Myocardial Responses to Eplontersen in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: The

Amyloid

Key Limitation
Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Phase III

Classified as Randomized controlled trial + Observational cohort study along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. 3Phase IIIActive
  4. 4Meta & Practice

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Myocardial Responses to Eplontersen in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: The CARDIO-TTRansform CMR study. Circulation. Published 2026;Nov 9. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/43002382/

Circulation

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/43002382/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Cardiology

View all Cardiology briefings →
CARDIOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

AI Identifies Hidden Heart Signal for Sudden Death Risk

AI can uncover subtle cardiac risks in routine scans, improving sudden death prediction. This discovery could enable earlier identification of thousands at risk for sudden cardiac death, allowing for timely interventions.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readScienceDaily
CARDIOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Senior Statins: Short-Term Safety, Long-Term Questions

While stopping statins after 70 might initially seem safe for those without prior heart events, the long-term risks suggest a careful discussion with your doctor is essential. For years, the medical community has debated the optimal duration of statin therapy, especially as patients enter advanced age.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readScienceDaily
Cardiology editorial photograph for Dietary Protein Source Linked to Testosterone Levels in Men
CARDIOLOGY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Dietary Protein Source Linked to Testosterone Levels in Men

For men, the source of dietary protein—animal (especially dairy) versus plant—appears to correlate with significant differences in circulating testosterone levels, suggesting a potential modifiable lifestyle factor. Currently, dietary interventions specifically differentiating between animal and plant protein for modulating testosterone levels are not a standard component of clinical practice beyond general healthy eating guidelines.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readScienceDaily