ClearMed
All Psychiatry BriefingsThe Lancet Psychiatry
PsychiatryMeta-Analysis5 min read

Sex differences in the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in people with acute schizophrenia: individual participant data pairwise, dose-response, and network meta-analyses

Overall treatment efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial) estimates from previous meta-analyses are relevant to both sexes.

Published in The Lancet PsychiatryMeta-analysis + Observational cohort study
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Study Cohort

7062 participants

We found no evidence of sex differences in the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) or overall adverse event profiles, and no different dose-response relationships, for the drugs studied.

What Changes?

Psychiatry · Meta-Analysis

Current Standard

Conventional psychiatry practice relies on standard-of-care monitoring and existing regimens prior to this + observational cohort study.

New Finding

However, we found some evidence that, among females, antipsychotics reduce all-cause dropout more, and increase antipsychotic-induced prolactin elevation versus (inactive comparison treatment), as compared with males.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the (real-world effectiveness in the trial), acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in adults with acute schizophrenia.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + observational cohort study (7062 participants) at the stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    To promote sex and gender equity, female participation in clinical trials and sex-stratified reporting should be encouraged.

What This Means for You

We found no evidence of sex differences in the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) or overall adverse event profiles, and no different dose-response relationships, for the drugs studied. However, we found some evidence that, among females, antipsychotics reduce all-cause dropout more, and increase antipsychotic-induced prolactin elevation versus (inactive comparison treatment), as compared with males. Overall treatment estimates from previous meta-analyses are relevant to both sexes. To promote sex and gender equity, female participation in clinical trials and sex-stratified reporting should be encouraged.

The Discovery

Antipsychotics are the mainstay of schizophrenia treatment, but their (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and tolerability might differ between females and males, and previous evidence on sex differences has been inconsistent and methodologically limited. We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the , acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in adults with acute schizophrenia. We performed individual participant data pairwise, dose-response, and network meta-analyses of antipsychotics versus (inactive comparison treatment) or another antipsychotic, using data from the Vivli and YODA trial data-sharing platforms (inception to April 9, 2025); the main analyses were restricted to fixed-dose trials. The primary outcome was overall symptoms on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale at week 6 (or closest). Secondary outcomes included all-cause dropout and other and tolerability outcomes. We performed one-stage pairwise meta-analyses to quantitatively test sex-treatment interactions, and two-stage sex-stratified dose-response and network meta-analyses to visually examine potential sex differences. Credibility of effect modification was assessed with the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses. People with lived experience were involved in planning and interpretation of the study. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD420251022957. We identified 33 eligible trials; 18 fixed-dose trials with 7062 participants (2168 females and 4894 males; of 5161 with race reported, 2954 White, 1187 Black, 752 Asian, and 268 of other or unspecified race; mean age 40·9 years; receiving haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, risperidone, or ) were included in the main analyses. There was no evidence of sex differences in drug effects on overall symptoms (difference of standardised mean difference [DoSMD] 0·04, 95% CI -0·09 to 0·18). Dose-response curves were similar in females and males, plateauing at 3-5 mg risperidone equivalents, and the network showed no clear sex-specific treatment effects. Antipsychotics reduced all-cause dropout more in females than in males (ratio of odds ratios 0·74, 95% CI 0·56-0·98; moderate credibility). Prolactin increase was greater in females (DoSMD 0·83, 0·67-0·99; high credibility); other tolerability outcomes showed no clear sex difference.

How It Works, Simply

This psychiatry research focuses on neurotransmitter circuit & synaptic plasticity modulation. Researchers evaluated it using a meta-analysis + Observational cohort study (7062 participants) at the meta-analysis stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the , acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in adults with acute schizophrenia.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a + observational cohort study (7062 participants) at the stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    To promote sex and gender equity, female participation in clinical trials and sex-stratified reporting should be encouraged.

01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Meta-analysis + Observational cohort study

Meta-analysis + Observational cohort study (7062 participants) · Meta-Analysis

Biological Pathway & Modality

Neurotransmitter circuit & synaptic plasticity modulation

Intervention: Sex differences in the , acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Antipsychotics are the mainstay of schizophrenia treatment, but their and tolerability might differ between females and males, and previous evidence on sex differences has been inconsistent and methodologically limited.

We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the , acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in adults with acute schizophrenia. We performed individual participant data pairwise, dose-response, and network meta-analyses of antipsychotics versus or another antipsychotic, using data from the Vivli and YODA trial data-sharing platforms (inception to April 9, 2025); the main analyses were restricted to fixed-dose trials.

The primary outcome was overall symptoms on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale at week 6 (or closest). Secondary outcomes included all-cause dropout and other and tolerability outcomes.

We performed one-stage pairwise meta-analyses to quantitatively test sex-treatment interactions, and two-stage sex-stratified dose-response and network meta-analyses to visually examine potential sex differences. Credibility of effect modification was assessed with the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses.

People with lived experience were involved in planning and interpretation of the study. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD420251022957.

We identified 33 eligible trials; 18 fixed-dose trials with 7062 participants (2168 females and 4894 males; of 5161 with race reported, 2954 White, 1187 Black, 752 Asian, and 268 of other or unspecified race; mean age 40·9 years; receiving haloperidol, olanzapine, paliperidone, risperidone, or ) were included in the main analyses. There was no evidence of sex differences in drug effects on overall symptoms (difference of standardised mean difference [DoSMD] 0·04, 95% CI -0·09 to 0·18).

Dose-response curves were similar in females and males, plateauing at 3-5 mg risperidone equivalents, and the network showed no clear sex-specific treatment effects. Antipsychotics reduced all-cause dropout more in females than in males (ratio of odds ratios 0·74, 95% CI 0·56-0·98; moderate credibility).

Prolactin increase was greater in females (DoSMD 0·83, 0·67-0·99; high credibility); other tolerability outcomes showed no clear sex difference.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

We found no evidence of sex differences in the or overall adverse event profiles, and no different dose-response relationships, for the drugs studied.

However, we found some evidence that, among females, antipsychotics reduce all-cause dropout more, and increase antipsychotic-induced prolactin elevation versus , as compared with males. Overall treatment estimates from previous meta-analyses are relevant to both sexes.

To promote sex and gender equity, female participation in clinical trials and sex-stratified reporting should be encouraged.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“We found no evidence of sex differences in the efficacy or overall adverse event profiles, and no different dose-response relationships, for the drugs studied.”

Published in The Lancet Psychiatry · Current Stage: Meta-Analysis

Psychiatry · Meta-Analysis
Study Type
Meta-analysis + Observational cohort study

Meta-analysis + Observational cohort study (7062 participants)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Adults with acute schizophrenia
Intervention & Mechanism
Sex differences in the efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial), acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics

Neurotransmitter circuit & synaptic plasticity modulation

Key Limitation
Pooled evidence synthesis depends on the quality, heterogeneity, and potential publication bias of included studies.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Meta-Analysis

Classified as Meta-analysis + Observational cohort study along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. Human Evidence
  4. 4Meta-AnalysisActive

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Sex differences in the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of antipsychotics in people with acute schizophrenia: individual participant data pairwise, dose-response, and network meta-analyses. The Lancet Psychiatry. Published 2026;Nov 15. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42815510/

The Lancet Psychiatry

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42815510/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Psychiatry

View all Psychiatry briefings →
PSYCHIATRY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

The role of white matter microstructure in the association between childhood maltreatment and adult post-traumatic symptoms

Childhood Trauma's Hidden Scar: How it Rewires the Brain and Fuels Adult Distress. Childhood trauma can alter the brain's white matter, a crucial communication network, which in turn may increase the risk of adult post-traumatic symptoms.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readMolecular Psychiatry
PSYCHIATRY · CLINICAL PRACTICE

Consistent Daily Routines Cut Pain, Depression in Older Adults

Consistent daily routines may offer older adults a simple way to reduce pain and depression. This suggests a simple, accessible behavioral intervention—maintaining regular schedules for sleep, meals, and activities—could significantly improve quality of life for older adults.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readScienceDaily
PSYCHIATRY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Rethinking University Mental Health for the AI Era: From Crisis Response to Core Mission

Reframing student mental health as core to the mission of universities justifies investment in digitally enabled care. With appropriate guardrails, AI can be integrated as a regulated component of this ecosystem, extending the reach of effective interventions while maintaining safety, equity, and institutional accountability.

4/5 Strong Trial
Evidence Meter · 4/5

Strong Clinical Evidence

Tested directly in patients through a prospective clinical trial or large multicenter human cohort.

1 min readJAMA Psychiatry