ClearMed
All Infectious Disease BriefingsThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
Infectious DiseasePhase III4 min read

Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia: a Phase 3, double-blind, non-inferiority randomised trial

The Phase 3, multinational, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 62 hospitals (58 in China, three in the USA, and one in Spain).

Published in The Lancet Infectious DiseasesRandomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

0%

Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam is statistically non-inferior to imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam for 14-day all-cause mortality in patients with HABP and VABP with a favourable safety profile.

What Changes?

Infectious Disease · Phase III

Current Standard

Masking was maintained for investigators and patients; emergency unmasking followed standard operating procedures.

New Finding

We aimed to compare the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety of imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam with imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients with HABP and VABP.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    Patients aged 18 years or older with HABP and VABP caused by clinically documented or suspected Gram-negative pathogens were assigned by stratified block randomisation at a 2:1 ratio to receive 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam or 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam via 30-min intravenous infusion every 6 h for 7-14 days with the dose adjusted according to renal function.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (534 patients) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

What This Means for You

Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam is statistically non-inferior to imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam for 14-day all-cause mortality in patients with HABP and VABP with a favourable safety profile.

The Discovery

New antibiotics are urgently needed for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). We aimed to compare the (real-world effectiveness in the trial) and safety of imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam with imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients with HABP and VABP.

The Phase 3, multinational, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 62 hospitals (58 in China, three in the USA, and one in Spain). Patients aged 18 years or older with HABP and VABP caused by clinically documented or suspected Gram-negative pathogens were assigned by stratified block randomisation at a 2:1 ratio to receive 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam or 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam via 30-min intravenous infusion every 6 h for 7-14 days with the dose adjusted according to renal function. Patients with previous use of prohibited antibiotics or conditions that could interfere with (real-world effectiveness in the trial) assessment were excluded. Masking was maintained for investigators and patients; emergency unmasking followed standard operating procedures. Missing mortality data were considered as survival in the primary endpoint analysis. The primary outcome was 14-day all-cause mortality in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, with a 10% non-inferiority margin (two-sided 95% CI). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05204563).

Between Oct 29, 2022, and Sept 29, 2024, 534 patients were screened, 450 were randomly assigned, and 449 were included in safety populations. The mITT population also included 449 patients (mean age was 60·8 years [SD 13·9]; 313 [7a clinically meaningful level] of 449 were male). In the mITT population, 14-day all-cause mortality was 3·a clinically meaningful level (nine of 299) for imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam versus 2·7% (four of 150) for imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (difference 0·2%; 95% CI -3·5% to 4·a clinically meaningful level). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (7%) of 299 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam and 16 (11%) of 150 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam group. No drug-related deaths were reported.

How It Works, Simply

This infectious disease research focuses on gut bacteria. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (534 patients) at the Phase III stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    Patients aged 18 years or older with HABP and VABP caused by clinically documented or suspected Gram-negative pathogens were assigned by stratified block randomisation at a 2:1 ratio to receive 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam or 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam via 30-min intravenous infusion every 6 h for 7-14 days with the dose adjusted according to renal function.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (534 patients) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
7%
Clinical Outcome
534 patients
Study Cohort
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (534 patients) · Phase III

Biological Pathway & Modality

Gut bacteria

Intervention: Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

New antibiotics are urgently needed for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP).

We aimed to compare the and safety of imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam with imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients with HABP and VABP.

The Phase 3, multinational, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial was conducted in 62 hospitals (58 in China, three in the USA, and one in Spain). Patients aged 18 years or older with HABP and VABP caused by clinically documented or suspected Gram-negative pathogens were assigned by stratified block randomisation at a 2:1 ratio to receive 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam or 1·25 g imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam via 30-min intravenous infusion every 6 h for 7-14 days with the dose adjusted according to renal function.

Patients with previous use of prohibited antibiotics or conditions that could interfere with assessment were excluded. Masking was maintained for investigators and patients; emergency unmasking followed standard operating procedures.

Missing mortality data were considered as survival in the primary endpoint analysis. The primary outcome was 14-day all-cause mortality in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, with a 10% non-inferiority margin (two-sided 95% CI).

This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05204563).

Between Oct 29, 2022, and Sept 29, 2024, 534 patients were screened, 450 were randomly assigned, and 449 were included in safety populations. The mITT population also included 449 patients (mean age was 60·8 years [SD 13·9]; 313 [7a clinically meaningful level] of 449 were male).

In the mITT population, 14-day all-cause mortality was 3·a clinically meaningful level (nine of 299) for imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam versus 2·7% (four of 150) for imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (difference 0·2%; 95% CI -3·5% to 4·a clinically meaningful level). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (7%) of 299 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam and 16 (11%) of 150 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam group.

No drug-related deaths were reported.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam is statistically non-inferior to imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam for 14-day all-cause mortality in patients with HABP and VABP with a favourable safety profile.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam is statistically non-inferior to imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam for 14-day all-cause mortality in patients with HABP and VABP with a favourable safety profile.”

Published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases · Current Stage: Phase III

Infectious Disease · Phase III
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (534 patients)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associ
Intervention & Mechanism
Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients

Gut bacteria

Key Limitation
Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Phase III

Classified as Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. 3Phase IIIActive
  4. 4Meta & Practice

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Imipenem-cilastatin-funobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam in patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia: a phase 3, double-blind, non-inferiority randomised trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Published 2026;Nov 4. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42982070/

The Lancet Infectious Diseases

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42982070/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Infectious Disease

View all Infectious Disease briefings →
INFECTIOUS DISEASE · CLINICAL PRACTICE

New International Guidelines Advance Phage Therapy for Superbugs

Personalized phage therapy, now backed by international guidelines, is becoming a viable and effective strategy against challenging multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. With antibiotic resistance posing a critical global health threat, these guidelines offer a vital new tool for clinicians.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readScienceDaily
INFECTIOUS DISEASE · PRECLINICAL

Successful archetype JC polyomavirus infection in hiPSC-derived neural culture of astrocytes and neurons

Our neural cell model reproduced many observations from PML brain tissue, suggesting that the model is appropriate to study key cellular events and the pathogenesis of JCPyV in neurodegeneration. JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) is the causative agent of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a fatal neurodegenerative disease in immunocompromised individuals.

2/5 Preclinical
Evidence Meter · 2/5

Animal & Preclinical Data

Demonstrated in living animal models before large-scale human safety and dosing trials begin.

1 min readThe Journal of Infectious Diseases
INFECTIOUS DISEASE · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Magnitude and durability of RSV-specific immune responses three years after hospitalization for RSV-associated acute respiratory illness among adults ≥50 years

RSV binding and neutralizing antibodies were transiently elevated following natural infection in older adults but waned to levels similar to RSV-negative participants by the next season's start. Vaccines that counter waning immunity are needed in this high-risk population.

3/5 Observational
Evidence Meter · 3/5

Real-World Observation

Finds meaningful patterns in human health records or cohorts, though observational data cannot prove direct cause.

1 min readThe Journal of Infectious Diseases