ClearMed
All Gastroenterology BriefingsThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
GastroenterologyPhase III6 min read

Safety and efficacy of weekly pemvidutide versus placebo for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (IMPACT): 48-week results from a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 2b study

The aim of the IMPACT trial was to assess the effects of one such agent, pemvidutide, in patients with MASH and stage F2 or F3 fibrosis (tissue scarring).

Published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & HepatologyRandomized controlled trial
5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Source

Clinical Outcome

22%

In patients with MASH, 48 weeks of pemvidutide treatment led to significant reductions in non-invasive tests of MASH inflammation and (tissue scarring), suggesting continued improvement in liver health.

What Changes?

Gastroenterology · Phase III

Current Standard

We previously reported the 24-week primary endpoints of MASH resolution and (tissue scarring) improvement.

New Finding

These data warrant the continued investigation of pemvidutide in a Phase 3 trial.

3 Key Takeaways

Plain English Summary
  1. 01Core Finding

    Here we report the secondary endpoints following 48 weeks of treatment.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (n=41) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

What This Means for You

In patients with MASH, 48 weeks of pemvidutide treatment led to significant reductions in non-invasive tests of MASH inflammation and (tissue scarring), suggesting continued improvement in liver health. These data warrant the continued investigation of pemvidutide in a Phase 3 trial.

The Discovery

Glucagon- dual receptor agonists have shown promise in treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). The aim of the IMPACT trial was to assess the effects of one such agent, pemvidutide, in patients with MASH and stage F2 or F3 (tissue scarring). We previously reported the 24-week primary endpoints of MASH resolution and improvement. Here we report the secondary endpoints following 48 weeks of treatment. IMPACT was a 48-week, randomised, (inactive comparison treatment)-controlled, double-blind, phase 2b trial in patients with biopsy-confirmed MASH and stage F2 or F3. Patients from 83 sites, including academic and community hospitals and private clinical research clinics, in the USA and Australia were randomly assigned (1:2:2) using an interactive web response system to receive once-weekly just-under-the-skin () pemvidutide (1·2 mg or 1·8 mg), administered without dose titration, or . Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignments throughout the study. The dual primary endpoints of MASH resolution without worsening of or at least one stage liver improvement without worsening of MASH were assessed at week 24. Liver biopsies were not collected at week 48, and only secondary endpoints were assessed at this timepoint. All analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat population consisting of all randomly assigned patients. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05989711) and is complete. From July 27, 2023, to Nov 21, 2025, 1557 patients were screened and 212 patients were randomly assigned to pemvidutide 1·2 mg (n=41), pemvidutide 1·8 mg (n=85), or (n=86). Mean age was 53·4 years (SD 12·4), mean BMI was 38·7 kg/m 2 (7·8), 123 (58%) patients were female, 89 (42%) were male, and 90 (42%) had type 2 diabetes. At week 48, least-squares mean relative changes in liver fat content were -45·2% (95% CI -56·0 to -34·5; difference from -37·1 percentage points [95% CI -50·6 to -23·5]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, -54·7% (-62·3 to -47·1; difference from -46·5 percentage points [-57·7 to -35·3]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and -8·2% (-16·5 to 0·2) in the group. The least-squares mean absolute change in corrected T1 relaxation time was -124·2 ms (95% CI -157·1 to -91·4; difference from -103·8 [95% CI -143·9 to -63·6]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, -139·5 ms (-161·7 to -117·3; difference from -119·0 [-151·2 to -86·9]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and -20·5 ms (-44·5 to 3·6) in the group. Least-squares mean changes in alanine aminotransferase were -37·8 IU/L (95% CI -44·5 to -31·1; difference from -27·5 [95% CI -35·8 to -19·2]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group and -37·4 IU/L (-42·1 to -32·7; difference from -27·1 [-33·9 to -20·3]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group versus -10·3 IU/L (-15·2 to -5·4) for the group. Least-squares mean changes in enhanced liver score were -0·49 (95% CI -0·71 to -0·28; difference from -0·65 [95 % CI -0·92 to -0·38]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, -0·58 (-0·74 to -0·43; difference from -0·74 [-0·97 to -0·52]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and 0·16 (-0·01 to 0·32) for the group. The most frequent pemvidutide-related adverse events were nausea (occurring in nine [a clinically meaningful level] of 41 patients in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, 35 [41%] of 85 patients in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and 15 [17%] of 86 patients in the group), diarrhoea (five [12%] in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, 19 [a clinically meaningful level] in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and seven [8%] in the group), and constipation (five [12%] in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, 15 [18%] in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and ten [12%] in the group). No severe or serious adverse events were defined as study medication related. Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in no patients in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, one (1%) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and three (3%) in the group.

How It Works, Simply

This gastroenterology research focuses on hormone pathway · Inflammation · Receptor targeting. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (n=41) at the Phase III stage of medical research.

3 Key Takeaways

Clinical Takeaways
  1. 01Core Finding

    Here we report the secondary endpoints following 48 weeks of treatment.

  2. 02Study Evidence

    Tested in a (n=41) at the Phase III stage.

  3. 03Practical Meaning

    Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Key Numbers

Quantitative Study Readout
48 weeks
Follow-Up Window
48-week
Follow-Up Window
01

Biological Mechanism & Study Design

Study Design & Cohort

Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (n=41) · Phase III

Biological Pathway & Modality

hormone pathway · Inflammation · Receptor targeting

Intervention: Safety and of weekly pemvidutide versus for metabolic

02

Experimental Findings & Endpoints

Glucagon- dual receptor agonists have shown promise in treating metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

The aim of the IMPACT trial was to assess the effects of one such agent, pemvidutide, in patients with MASH and stage F2 or F3 . We previously reported the 24-week primary endpoints of MASH resolution and improvement.

Here we report the secondary endpoints following 48 weeks of treatment. IMPACT was a 48-week, randomised, -controlled, double-blind, phase 2b trial in patients with biopsy-confirmed MASH and stage F2 or F3.

Patients from 83 sites, including academic and community hospitals and private clinical research clinics, in the USA and Australia were randomly assigned (1:2:2) using an interactive web response system to receive once-weekly pemvidutide (1·2 mg or 1·8 mg), administered without dose titration, or . Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignments throughout the study.

The dual primary endpoints of MASH resolution without worsening of or at least one stage liver improvement without worsening of MASH were assessed at week 24. Liver biopsies were not collected at week 48, and only secondary endpoints were assessed at this timepoint.

All analyses were conducted in the intention-to-treat population consisting of all randomly assigned patients. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05989711) and is complete.

From July 27, 2023, to Nov 21, 2025, 1557 patients were screened and 212 patients were randomly assigned to pemvidutide 1·2 mg (n=41), pemvidutide 1·8 mg (n=85), or (n=86). Mean age was 53·4 years (SD 12·4), mean BMI was 38·7 kg/m 2 (7·8), 123 (58%) patients were female, 89 (42%) were male, and 90 (42%) had type 2 diabetes.

At week 48, least-squares mean relative changes in liver fat content were -45·2% (95% CI -56·0 to -34·5; difference from -37·1 percentage points [95% CI -50·6 to -23·5]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, -54·7% (-62·3 to -47·1; difference from -46·5 percentage points [-57·7 to -35·3]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and -8·2% (-16·5 to 0·2) in the group. The least-squares mean absolute change in corrected T1 relaxation time was -124·2 ms (95% CI -157·1 to -91·4; difference from -103·8 [95% CI -143·9 to -63·6]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, -139·5 ms (-161·7 to -117·3; difference from -119·0 [-151·2 to -86·9]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and -20·5 ms (-44·5 to 3·6) in the group.

Least-squares mean changes in alanine aminotransferase were -37·8 IU/L (95% CI -44·5 to -31·1; difference from -27·5 [95% CI -35·8 to -19·2]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group and -37·4 IU/L (-42·1 to -32·7; difference from -27·1 [-33·9 to -20·3]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group versus -10·3 IU/L (-15·2 to -5·4) for the group. Least-squares mean changes in enhanced liver score were -0·49 (95% CI -0·71 to -0·28; difference from -0·65 [95 % CI -0·92 to -0·38]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, -0·58 (-0·74 to -0·43; difference from -0·74 [-0·97 to -0·52]; p<0·0001) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and 0·16 (-0·01 to 0·32) for the group.

The most frequent pemvidutide-related adverse events were nausea (occurring in nine [a clinically meaningful level] of 41 patients in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, 35 [41%] of 85 patients in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and 15 [17%] of 86 patients in the group), diarrhoea (five [12%] in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, 19 [a clinically meaningful level] in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and seven [8%] in the group), and constipation (five [12%] in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, 15 [18%] in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and ten [12%] in the group). No severe or serious adverse events were defined as study medication related.

Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in no patients in the pemvidutide 1·2 mg group, one (1%) in the pemvidutide 1·8 mg group, and three (3%) in the group.

03

Clinical Translation & Practice Context

In patients with MASH, 48 weeks of pemvidutide treatment led to significant reductions in non-invasive tests of MASH inflammation and , suggesting continued improvement in liver health.

These data warrant the continued investigation of pemvidutide in a Phase 3 trial.

03

The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl

“In patients with MASH, 48 weeks of pemvidutide treatment led to significant reductions in non-invasive tests of MASH inflammation and fibrosis, suggesting continued improvement in liver health.”

Published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · Current Stage: Phase III

Gastroenterology · Phase III
Study Type
Randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial (n=41)

Evidence Score
5/5 · Gold-Standard Human Evidence
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

Who It Applies To
Patients with MASH and stage F2 or F3 fibrosis (tissue scarring)
Intervention & Mechanism
Safety and efficacy (real-world effectiveness in the trial) of weekly pemvidutide versus placebo (inactive comparison treatment) for metabolic

GLP-1 hormone pathway · Inflammation · Receptor targeting

Key Limitation
Large Phase III clinical evidence — long-term durability and rare subgroup effects remain under study.

Translational Stage

LEVEL 1 · Phase III

Classified as Randomized controlled trial along the clinical evidence continuum

  1. Lab & Discovery
  2. Early Trials
  3. 3Phase IIIActive
  4. 4Meta & Practice

Indexed Clinical Entities

Original Publication & AMA Citation

Safety and efficacy of weekly pemvidutide versus placebo for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (IMPACT): 48-week results from a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 2b study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. Published 2026;Nov 11. Accessed November 15, 2026. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/43014327/

The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/43014327/

Read Original Paper

Continue Reading

Related in Gastroenterology

View all Gastroenterology briefings →
GASTROENTEROLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Prevalence of liver fibrosis and steatotic liver disease in community-dwelling adults in China (the CHESS-LiverHealth project): cross-sectional baseline data from a prospective cohort study

Silent Liver Damage: A Hidden Epidemic in China's Adult Population. Liver scarring and fatty liver disease are widespread among Chinese adults, largely fueled by metabolic issues and alcohol.

4/5 Strong Trial
Evidence Meter · 4/5

Strong Clinical Evidence

Tested directly in patients through a prospective clinical trial or large multicenter human cohort.

1 min readThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Gastroenterology editorial photograph for Aspirin after curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (ASAC): a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
GASTROENTEROLOGY · PHASE III

Aspirin after curative-intent treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (ASAC): a multicentre, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Aspirin After Colon Cancer: A Surprising Setback for a Common Drug. Taking aspirin after surgery for colon cancer that spread to the liver did not prevent the cancer from returning and was linked to worse survival and more serious side effects.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
GASTROENTEROLOGY · REAL-WORLD COHORT

Genetic variants and the risk of renal impairment in decompensated cirrhosis: a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study

Unlocking the Genetic Link Between Liver Failure and Kidney Damage. Scientists have pinpointed a specific gene, SUSD1, that significantly increases the risk of kidney problems in people with severe liver disease.

5/5 Gold Standard
Evidence Meter · 5/5

Gold-Standard Human Evidence

Backed by randomized controlled human trials or a formal meta-analysis pooling multiple clinical studies.

1 min readThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology