3 Key Takeaways
Plain English Summary- 01Core Finding
Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days.
- 02Study Evidence
Tested in a randomized controlled trial (1128 patients) at the randomized clinical trial stage.
- 03Practical Meaning
Controlled trial findings show causal benefit under protocol rules; real-world effectiveness can vary across patients.
What This Means for You
Among high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index did not reduce the incidence of a composite outcome of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days compared with routine hemodynamic therapy.
The Discovery
It remains unclear if intraoperative hemodynamic therapy should be guided by cardiac index. To evaluate whether individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy vs routine hemodynamic therapy improves outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. This multicenter, single-blind, superiority randomized clinical trial enrolled high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery between October 8, 2023, and October 25, 2025, at 12 university medical centers in Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, and Spain. The date of last follow-up was January 15, 2026. Patients were randomized to individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index vs routine hemodynamic therapy (with blinded cardiac index monitoring). The primary outcome was a composite of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days. The primary outcome was a composite of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days. Of the 1128 patients enrolled, 1111 were randomized and 1095 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 67 years [IQR, 59-74 years]; 49.4% were female). The primary outcome occurred in 243 of 549 patients (44.3%) in the individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy group vs 256 of 546 patients (46.9%) in the routine hemodynamic therapy group (relative risk, 0.94 [95.1% CI, 0.83-1.08]; P = .38). There were no between-group differences for the incidence of the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days.
How It Works, Simply
This cardiology research focuses on cardiovascular hemodynamic & lipid pathway modulation. Researchers evaluated it using a randomized controlled trial (1128 patients) at the randomized clinical trial stage of medical research.
3 Key Takeaways
Clinical Takeaways- 01Core Finding
Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days.
- 02Study Evidence
Tested in a randomized controlled trial (1128 patients) at the randomized clinical trial stage.
- 03Practical Meaning
Controlled trial findings show causal benefit under protocol rules; real-world effectiveness can vary across patients.
Biological Mechanism & Study Design
Study Design & Cohort
Randomized controlled trial
Randomized controlled trial (1128 patients) · Randomized Clinical Trial
Biological Pathway & Modality
Cardiovascular hemodynamic & lipid pathway modulation
Intervention: Individualized Cardiac Index-Guided Hemodynamic Therapy
Experimental Findings & Endpoints
It remains unclear if intraoperative hemodynamic therapy should be guided by cardiac index.
To evaluate whether individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy vs routine hemodynamic therapy improves outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. This multicenter, single-blind, superiority randomized clinical trial enrolled high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery between October 8, 2023, and October 25, 2025, at 12 university medical centers in Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, and Spain.
The date of last follow-up was January 15, 2026. Patients were randomized to individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index vs routine hemodynamic therapy (with blinded cardiac index monitoring).
The primary outcome was a composite of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days.
The primary outcome was a composite of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days.
Of the 1128 patients enrolled, 1111 were randomized and 1095 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 67 years [IQR, 59-74 years]; 49.4% were female). The primary outcome occurred in 243 of 549 patients (44.3%) in the individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy group vs 256 of 546 patients (46.9%) in the routine hemodynamic therapy group (relative risk, 0.94 [95.1% CI, 0.83-1.08]; P = .38).
There were no between-group differences for the incidence of the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days.
Clinical Translation & Practice Context
Among high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index did not reduce the incidence of a composite outcome of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days compared with routine hemodynamic therapy.
The Bottom Line · Clinical Pearl
“Among high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index did not reduce the incidence of a composite outcome of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days compared with routine hemodynamic therapy.”
Published in JAMA · Current Stage: Randomized Clinical Trial
